That thing is muy sharp!! Problem was me talking about SX in a Fender thread.![]()
lol
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That thing is muy sharp!! Problem was me talking about SX in a Fender thread.![]()
ya... realized that a little late.That thing is muy sharp!! Problem was me talking about SX in a Fender thread.![]()

I tried a Jaguar once and it had the worst case of neck dive I've ever experienced.
ya... realized that a little late.
o well. if nothing else, at the time it was a good excuse to put up a picture of the coolest-looking jags.![]()

They look very cool and are very versatile. They have alot of style and they have a J pup setup that is quite popular.
I am thinking of getting one, but just wonder if bassists dislike them for a particular reason(s) that I should know about.
Link Removed
They look like the jazz bass' stupid, ugly twin, separated at birth and reuinted only to discover it is unloved and unwanted so it gets a bunch of ridiculous body modifications in an attempt to find its own identity, and sadly, fails.
I've wondered this as well, I mean I'd like to have one someday too.
I owned a Jaguar briefly. The construction and fit and finish were top-notch. It was very easy to play and was very versatile with the tones that it provided. However, the lack of shielding in the body cavity and pickguard as well as the curious placement of the preamp board (right above the neck pickup in an unshielded route) caused a buzz that was unbearable. The amount of work needed to shield the entire bass was not worth to me on an $750-800 bass. Shouldn't be necessary on an instrument in that range. IMO a great idea executed poorly. If you don't mind the work needed to do the shielding, go for it. Probably a better deal used.
They do have more appeal than the rather large number of people who've never tried one but just dismiss the looks or some other poorly understood difference as "not up to par with a J or P" would like to assume. The "technical" complaints are largely inaccurate. Having played a few Jags, they are far more versatile than standard Fender designs, play like butter and (at least those I've seen or played) are superbly built (not as consistently the case for MIA and MIM Fenders).
If not mistaken, I think Fender has had the most successful bass model launch with the Jag since the P and J were rolled out. Based on the bucks Fender is putting into marketing the model, I have to assume it's taken hold (in other words, somebody must like them - LOL). I think the resistance and negativity toward the Jag is one of the paradoxes about musicians -- how come a bunch of folks who are supposed to be involved in a creative endeavor are so stuck on traditional instrument designs?![]()
To answer the OP accurately one would have to question everyone who doesn't care for the Jag.
That said, I'd like one but it's enough of a kind of *works here but doesn't work so well there* type of an ax that I can't justify it. If it came in seafoam or surf green I'd be much more tempted*.
That said, whenever I catch myself using the word 'tempted' describing a choice, I usually decline. I see it as my subconscious' way of telling me I don't think it would be right. Unless I happened upon a screaming deal...
FYI guys it looks like GC is putting the jag on clearance...? Could mean production is ending (either completely, or to move to Mexico).
Was in local GC this morning and Jag hang tag said $749.
