Not reallyHmm, would the Beta57 be better?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Not reallyHmm, would the Beta57 be better?
I hear you. But, it does depend on the gig. Getting to a big stage high profile gig and having the sound engineer insist that you turn your bass down to the point where it is barely audible can change your perspective.
A trend too often seen (and heard) start the mix with how loud you can get the kick drum. Forget that the punch is at 100, just see how much 40 you can get.I have to tell sound men quite often how to Eq the bass since so many of them are leftovers from the Disco era with super deep vomit inducing lows and bombastic bass drum volumes that destroy the intent of the group. Ever notice how many try to see how loud they can get a bass drum, that's a firing offense right off the bat.
Not if you're paying him.First page in my handbook: If you work with the Sound Person, he/she will be more likely to make you and your band sound good. Never do anything to piss of a sound person. Yes, the good ones will make you sound good even if you're a jerk, but it's never helpful to be combative - even with a good FOH person, you're wasting time if you're arguing. For the gigs I do, everyone (production folks and performers included) is there to create something together; arguing with the sound person means it's your last time playing there. You'll find that to be true in most circumstances.
Soundman suggestion huh? Take it with a grain of salt. Bring your rig. Have him take a feed from the DI. Just watch your volume. Many FOH have to deal with loud bands that have no concept of how a PA works. Low to moderate stage volume is key. Let the PA do the work.
Just say no. I don’t work for the sound guy, he works for me. Unless you want to play amp less of course.
Like many mics, SM 57's do roll off some lows. The roll off isn't as much in real life as you see in the curves - that's a 2 foot curve, and when you close mic things, the proximity effect will give you a considerable bass boost at low frequencies.They are a little light on the lows, though.
Doesn't happen much in my world, If it does in your world, I'm sure that changes things.Not if you're paying him.
if I'm doing FOH, I will mic your cabinet if you want, but I will also use a DI, so I can get solid low end. I'll blend your cabinet in at mid and high freq's, so I can get the character of your amp, but it'll sound a whole lot better than your amp alone does when I blend in low end from the DI.
I'm doing twice the work to get you better results, and dedicating 2 channels on my board to you.
Nice, I don’t doubt that plywood like that resonated quite a bit. My point was will the mics really pick that stuff at 200 Hz up? What was the dispersion pattern of the plywood resonator? Also, I would say you went pretty “worst case” with that, especially if it was framed only on the edges of the 4x8 ply. And the guitars also put out plenty at 200 Hz.My data were mainly gathered at 200 Hz. No particular reason for that choice, except that there is significant bass content there. I did verify there were no odd ball resonances going on. I used a 4’x8’ sheet of 5/8” plywood on a frame; the standard stage plate on the mobile risers we all get to play on. The induced vibration in the stage sheet was significant with three different cabs, and generally not affected by isolation devices placed beneath the cabinet. There is a bit more to it, but, you will have to wait for the paper.
What I will say is that all the experimental details are there. So, anyone is free to check what was done. That’s the way it works. Science is objective.
So I've been with this folk group for over a year now, and we play with a loud full 5 piece band, singer plays an acoustic guitar, full drum kit and two electric guitars. I own an ampeg V4B reissue 100 watt tube head and so far every show we have played I've been told not to use it. They run me through the PA and Mic everyone else. Is this fairly common practice? If so what's the point of even owning an amp as a bassist. Just a bit of a rant, when you drop a couple of grand on a nice amp you want to use it!
+1 This stuff totally applies to all instrumentation on the stage.Nice, I don’t doubt that plywood like that resonated quite a bit. My point was will the mics really pick that stuff at 200 Hz up? What was the dispersion pattern of the plywood resonator? Also, I would say you went pretty “worst case” with that, especially if it was framed only on the edges of the 4x8 ply. And the guitars also put out plenty at 200 Hz.
So my point is how much bleed really from the bass, and if you’re also getting bleed from other sources, so what? Why does the bassist always have to carry this “turn down you’re too loud” water for the band?
To me, my bass amp IS PART OF MY TONE. It is something I've worked at developing along with my technique- making the amp work in a certain way.
For some sound guy to take a DI off the bass itself or not mike the cab is like telling the drummer to "just play by slapping your hands on your knees; I can make that sound like drums in the FOH" is just not right.
Some guys (Tim Commerford, Rob Weston) have been known to NOT use a DI in either live or recordings. as a matter of fact, Tim DEMANDED no DI on the Evil Empire album!
Now some players like the Hi-Fi sound of a DI'd bass. I'm not one of them. Sounds like you aren't either, since you have a V4B (which does HAVE IT'S OWN TONAL CHARACTER).