Doner Designs
Steve Doner
- Jun 2, 2012
- 5,784
- 6,819
- Disclosures
- Doner Designs is an alias for Steve Doner
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My brother-in-law is a great guy. He's smart, funny, and fun to hang with. We get along great. But when it comes to music, he's not knowledgeable. As such, he always equates "fast" and "busy" with better. Its like he's not listening to the music, just gawking at the technique.
Whenever we are together, he ALWAYS asks me if I can play Yes or Rush. He will show me You Tube clips of these guys, and say, "now THAT's bass playing." I have nothing against Geddy or Chris; they are gods. But that style of out-in-front playing just never appealed to me very much. I'm more interested in bass lines that provide a foundation and groove for the song, and/or establish a counter-melody. I find the bass lines of guys like James Jamerson and Paul McCartney much more interesting. That's just my preference.
My question is: why do so many people assume that playing more notes, or playing faster, means you are a better musician? Is it just that they don't understand music, and, in particular, the role of the bass in most songs?
where is the unlike buttonAsk Mozart.
The way you asked your question is biased so any response you get you contrary to your idea is most likely going to be dismissed. If you can avoid that, I have some answers.
1.) No instrument has a set role. It is up to the creativity of the artist to find new ways to use something. The role of the bass is whatever the player wants it to be.
2.) Playing more notes is exciting. Playing less notes is boring. For all the yammering TBers do about "the pocket" the truth is no one really likes boring bass players that play less. Even old school guys like Duck Dunn and James Jamerson played more than on-beat root quarter notes. There is a point of diminishing returns for playing too much, but more is more fun.
3.) Its a simple matter of what I think of as "leveling." I'm a RPG nut, which are full of skill trees. To move from one level of the skill tree to another, you have to meet the prerequisites. If a bass player can shred, its given that he\she can just play a back beat. Mike Manring, Victor Wooten, Les Claypool, Nick Schendzielos, Jaco, Stanley Clarke, Ryan Martinie, etc, etc, etc can plan anything they want. They OWN their instrument. Playing whole notes at 90bpm is a waste of their enormous talents.
4.) No one talks about the "pocket" players because no one cares. I don't know anyone that says Michael Anthony or Nikki Sixx are awesome bass players. People may like them because of their bands or their personalities, but they play forgettable lines. They are co-stars in someone else's movie; I can't dig that. Steve Harris IS Iron Maiden. He doesn't need to shred solos, but his playing is what drives their songs. Geezer Butler is Tony Iommi's equal, not his rhythm section.
5.) If you think less is more, try listen to SunnO))) or some other drone band. That stuff is boring AF.
6.) Some people have a little trouble with this: James Jamerson has been dead for 33 years. The Beatles were a big deal 50 years ago and Paul McCartney hasn't been a relevant musical force since the 80s. That stuff is old man. They played in a style that doesn't really exist anymore. Music has become more complex, as has the playing, to a point where even Rush and Yes are considered a little quaint. As the complexity of the music increases, by necessity, so does the playing of the bassist. If you are happy with old music that there will never be more of, have at it; whatever makes you happy. However, don't be surprised when obsolete playing paradigms aren't enthusiastically supported.
Michael Anthony was a good player, probably better than Wolfgang he just doesn't have a rockstar daddy.Michael Anthony or Nikki Sixx
It's the rhythm that turns most people on. Only a small percentage actually listens to the composition and hears the separate instruments. We, musicians have to live with it....My question is: why do so many people assume that playing more notes, or playing faster, means you are a better musician? Is it just that they don't understand music, and, in particular, the role of the bass in most songs?

Non musicians account for most of the audience at any gig or event. Every musician should be able to pull out some flash to impress the masses, and some mature musical subtlety to appease the "true believers" in the crowd. If the nature of the game. Also, you can't please everyone. As bass players we can afford to be simple, and luckily we are usually least concerned with flash, however fast technical playing is some of the easiest stuff to learn so there shouldn't be any reason not to have a trick or two in your bag. If that's what it takes, remember most of us are working musicians. If you're an artist do what you want, if you want a gig, lappeal to your (non musician) audience.
My brother-in-law is a great guy. He's smart, funny, and fun to hang with. We get along great. But when it comes to music, he's not knowledgeable. As such, he always equates "fast" and "busy" with better. Its like he's not listening to the music, just gawking at the technique.
Whenever we are together, he ALWAYS asks me if I can play Yes or Rush. He will show me You Tube clips of these guys, and say, "now THAT's bass playing." I have nothing against Geddy or Chris; they are gods. But that style of out-in-front playing just never appealed to me very much. I'm more interested in bass lines that provide a foundation and groove for the song, and/or establish a counter-melody. I find the bass lines of guys like James Jamerson and Paul McCartney much more interesting. That's just my preference.
My question is: why do so many people assume that playing more notes, or playing faster, means you are a better musician? Is it just that they don't understand music, and, in particular, the role of the bass in most songs?
I was made to jam with this ex-con drummer one time... it was hilarious cuz he could only play magazines in the joint, never had a kick drum. Hes out now and plays "lead percussion" for lack of a better term, all night long. I mean its an absolute mess, like 10 machine guns ragin all at the same time. Try to groove? Forget it. And if you say anything he'll punch you. So funny....
I actually leave notes out.My brother-in-law is a great guy. He's smart, funny, and fun to hang with. We get along great. But when it comes to music, he's not knowledgeable. As such, he always equates "fast" and "busy" with better. Its like he's not listening to the music, just gawking at the technique.
Whenever we are together, he ALWAYS asks me if I can play Yes or Rush. He will show me You Tube clips of these guys, and say, "now THAT's bass playing." I have nothing against Geddy or Chris; they are gods. But that style of out-in-front playing just never appealed to me very much. I'm more interested in bass lines that provide a foundation and groove for the song, and/or establish a counter-melody. I find the bass lines of guys like James Jamerson and Paul McCartney much more interesting. That's just my preference.
My question is: why do so many people assume that playing more notes, or playing faster, means you are a better musician? Is it just that they don't understand music, and, in particular, the role of the bass in most songs?