• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why do the session legends all use P basses? (SBL Video Discussion)

Wanted to discuss this video w/you guys.


I can relate to the problems with the active 5 string that the engineers seemed to want to fix. As it was essentially the issues I was experiencing that led to me trading/selling said bass for a P Bass.


I wouldn't think that "session legends" would always use a P bass. I know whether it be a live gig or or a session, depending upon the music, I might be playing one of 3 or 4 different basses I regularly play.
 
I can't believe this thread. Maybe it's because I love my Fender "P". Or maybe it's because I've done some mixing, and understand how various instruments fit into a mix, and how that has pretty much nothing to do with what you bring to a gig?

It is entertaining though... ~reaches for more popcorn~ ...
I was really surprised by the ignorance and incompetence of the local public aswell
This thread just shows it all
 
Music is art even when it is imagined entirely in one person's head and executed faithfully by drones. How is that different from a deaf Beethoven, through a conductor, telling the seventh cellist in a section exactly what to play and how to play it? The tone of a bass part is not necessarily the thing that affects the artistic quality of the music being made. It's just a color, like titanium white. You can paint a room in a fixer upper with titanium white or you can paint a great painting that will hang in galleries. It's just one thing.
I think the difference is that a lot of us here think we're Beethoven, rather than the seventh cellist.
 
Joe Osborne was a session legend, and he used a Jazz, if I recall correctly...

When he first got it he was pissed because he asked for a p bass and fender sent him a prototype j bass to try.

I am sure you have heard of Carol Kaye. She was / is a fine studio bass player. She got away from the Pbass. She still played great music with and without it.

But when she was doing a lot of sessions she wasn't playing that Ibanez bass. Funny enough though, she sounds like her on that bass too.

I don't think the reason is all on the Engineers! No one Told James Jamerson he had to play the P Bass! He did it because he liked that sound and that's how he got his trademark sound!

He was angry about playing the p bass at first too, he considered himself a upright player.

Thanks Paul Ill for chiming in, I have enjoyed your interviews on Bobby owsinski's podcast, and you've done way more recording work than I'll ever do.

My only session in a major studio was done with my 5 string reverend, and they were ok with it, but the flats I had on it were requested to be changed to rounds for the next session the following day to fit that particular music better by both the producer and engineer. They were changed by the next day as requested. There were other times rounds were requested of me and I obliged there too. If it made what the person producing the session envisioned able to happen, then it's not my business to tell them otherwise. Then there were times that there was more opportunity for discussion, but I knew who had the final say and it wasn't me.
 
You have to try to see things from the perspective of the producer and/or engineer - they're producing songs, not just bass lines. This is why they're called "producers". Their task is to take abstract vision - "the melody is upbeat, while lyrics have a darker undertone", "we want to retain some of the grit and energy of the demo, but more polished", etc. - and execute all the concrete steps needed to make the end product. AND this needs to be done within the constraints of money and/or time. Even if you've got a Beyonce budget, you're managing every minute because you've got a release date target to hit, plus you've got other projects scheduled, etc.

Also realize that all music is massively self-referential. Even when something comes along that's new and different, a careful analysis almost always shows that the novelty is more about an unusual combination of elements from the past. Knowing how to create various familiar elements precisely and efficiently equals a producer with a very full work calendar.

So..... you're a producer. Unless the song is going to prominently feature a very specific bass sound, you just need something that you know will serve the overall sound well. It helps a lot if you've got a bass sound that is flexible and that you are familiar with - i.e. you know that if you find in mixing that a deeper, dubbier sound would be nice, you can boost at, say, ~220hz with a medium Q - you don't have to go searching for tones. Which is good, 'cause you've still got 23 other tracks on this song to dial in, and 6 more songs in this project, and the release date coincides with the world tour announcement....................

So yeah, these guys often want a P bass. A lot of times, they even want a specific P bass that they've recorded before. Not because they think it's the alpha and omega of ultimate bass tone, but because they know it will work, because they know exactly how to make it work even if there's a fairly drastic change in vision during mixing a month down the road.
Sorry but that's just too much common sense and too reasonable a point of view for this forum. I'd rather be like the other posters that call the producers lazy or imply they are incompetent.

Laugh-out-loud...
 
Also, in the early days, Fenders were the standard for everyone. You had Fender, and a lot of lesser stuff. Almost every session bassist, by default, owned a Fender.

And every P Bass had fairly heavy gauge flat wound strings. Not only that, it was a real point of pride how old the strings were. If they became too dirty, guys would boil them, and put them right back on. This was often mentioned in magazines like Downbeat at the time.
 
Looking at people's faces in elevators, the music played there doesn't to entertain them very much...

Elevator etiquette. You don't know what's going on in their heads.

Some people get nervous in elevators. The music calms their nerves. I'll take a session recording elevator music any ol' time. As long as the check doesn't bounce.

PS: Haven't done a session in decades.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Watchootognbout
Ok, well I'm saying that in 1978 no one told John Paul Jones he wasn't allowed to play a Jazz in the studio.

I owe you an apology if I failed to read the prior postings as carefully as I should have. Of course, many many great bass lines and recordings have been made using the Jazz Bass. In your example, though, whoever the producer was wisely didn't say anything regarding the Jazz Bass. Not that he couldn't have. It would have been a foolish thing to do. But as has been pointed out, record producers have been known to destroy artists material. I've seen it happen and heard of it happening even more.
 
No matter how much we love music, no matter how much we love bass. Once we start being paid, what we love becomes work, and I know of no work where you only get to do what you love. Whether it is playing songs you don't like, or whether it means leaving the house on a cold night when you would rather snuggle with your significant other. Being a working musician means do you have to sometimes do what you have to do, instead of what you want to do. Is it a surprise that sometimes doing what you have to do may include playing a P-bass ?
 
[QUOTE="alaskaleftybass, post: 22145890

You just can't get THAT SOUND out of any other bass if that's what you're looking for. To play devil's advocate against myself, one of my favorite albums of all time is Boz Scaggs Down Two Then Left. That is all Jazz bass, and it has impeccable tone on every track.
[/QUOTE]

Are you sure about that? Sounds like a '62 p bass with flats and the tone way up.
 
Everyone here is right depending on his/her perspective. Music recording falls in between two extreme situations :
I -a producer wants to make money (hence spending as little as possible) with music that will please as many people as possible. Art has little to do in this.
II -an artist (or band) has a project, it doesn't matter if it pleases people (hopefully it will because everyone has to eat at the end of the day).
Of course these situations are extremes and recorded music falls in between these two types at various degrees. I can't help thinking we're more towards type I than, say, in the 70's (which were not my days I have to say).
I'm a hobbyist, don't play bass for a living, never put a foot in a studio and never will because it's not of my goals. So I believe people when they say the P-bass is a must. This is not breaking news. On the other hand, plenty of music I listen to (these days mostly jazz, funk and some old R&B) is presumably not recorded with a P-bass. I say presumably, because I admit that I focus more on the player's style than it's gear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpazzTheBassist
Maybe 30+ years ago. There are so many more options today....
I personally can say that there really isn't a bass I don't like, I just like some better than others. I can say that a p bass absolutely does not work well for church and worship music, at least where I'm playing. Too aggressive and clanky with my playing style. The warm, neutral generic tone is what we're after.
 
I don't really think Marcus Miller and Nathan East are session bassists the way most people think of session bassists. When these dudes work sessions, they're bass virtuosos for hire.

Like you don't hire Nathan East to tell him to play these five notes on the score and stay in the pocket. You get him so he can play his six string and go high and low and do some fancy Nathan East licks to let the listener know you paid for Nathan East.

You don't hire Marcus Miller to get a Jamerson lite vibe. You don't hire him if what you need is a picked flats sound. You hire him to sound like Marcus Miller and you want that thick sound and you probably want a little slap, too.

Sure, these dudes are pros and they'd absolutely play five notes and stay in the pocket and do that for five minutes, too, but then why did you blow your budget on Marcus Miller and Nathan East? That's like hiring Eddie Van Halen if you just needed punk rock power chords.

If you're a virtuoso for hire, that's different than being a true utility session player.

Maybe you should check the discographies for Marcus and Nathan. Marcus was one of the first call session bassists in New York along with Franciso Cetano and Will Lee in the '70s and '80s and has recorded with Luther Vandross, Lonnie Liston Smith, Lenny White, and Aretha Franklin to name a few. Nathan got his start with Barry White and has recorded with Phil Collins, Eric Clapton, Anita Baker, Daft Punk and many others.

Marcus with Luther Vandross:


Nathan East with Daft Punk:


They weren't hired just for their virtuosity.
 
What? How the heck did Adam Clayton get on THAT list of players. Sure he might play a jazz bass, but come on....

poor Adam....he plays a very simple part in one hit single (and preserving a lot of space in the song that is supposed to border a melancholy feel) and a few other songs and he is eternally chastised for it........ I guess nobody wants to remember that he does have some decent basslines with movement, like "Two Hearts Beat As One"..... :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blad51
There are people here with way more experience in the studio than I have. There is something to be said about the social role of producer vs hired musician.

In the few sessions I've done, the producer is the king, and us musicians are there to make that producer's vision happen. If the producer wants a precision bass with flats on the track, I'll reach for it and happily use it because that person is paying me to make their art happen - to me, that's still a crazy concept - I'm being paid to make art. So many of my artist friends are in the "starving artist" category, and here I am with four or five strings making money to play what other people want me to play. Sometimes those other people can even play bass reasonably well.

It's humbling. Especially if you're like me, and not part of "the studio scene" and you're not well known, or trusted.

I've also had producers and engineers rave about my Lakland 55-02 sound, but only if I use a trick. That trick was to run the blend pot all the way over to the neck pickup. They seem to love that gooey, low-mid super-big round tone. I don't think anyone I've played in the studio for cared much for the sound of the other pickups on tracks, except for the art-rock band I was in years ago - but I was in that art-rock band, not a session player.

I learned that little neck-pickup trick from Dave Swift.

But I still always carry a Precision (actually a Fender FSR PJ but I never use the bridge pickup on it) with flats to every session and always take it out of the case FIRST as the producer/engineer is watching me... ;-)

How many people here have been paid to play on a session at a studio that charges by the hour?
 

Latest posts