• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why I NEVER Vent On Here About Band Problems

Apr 11, 2005
127,255
125,172
Plymouth NC
Disclosures
Endorsing: Yamaha, Ampeg, Line 6, EMG
Example 1:

Lazy sub drummer, bad gig (not humor)

Example 2:

Venting - LS can't handle playing in a bar that serves shots.

I had so many problems with the main band I used to be in for years to where every other gig ended with me leaving with an upset stomach, but in all that time, I never once commented on here how miserable an experience it was, who was doing what horrible thing to whom, or anything like that. And for the most part, I still don't. Anything I had to say about it on here was always positive and happy and never bad. The worst I might have said is how one of the major acts we backed up didn't want to hear anything but himself, which he always thought was funny. Why? Number one, commenting so negatively about co-workers you work with day in and day out is not only unprofessional, but if it gets back to them, it can totally lead to even worse problems. Number two, these two thread examples show what insane replies you can expect.

Shall we dissect them? Yes, let's...

Example 1 concerns a band of longtime pros getting a recommendation for a pro drummer to sub for a gig from a professional album producer two months out, only the drummer did absolutely no homework for the gig and pooped up the joint, and the BL reacted a little more publicly than he should have. Some people correctly realized that stuff happens once in a while, and the OP was just venting and wasn't looking for solutions, just a few "Been there done that" stories from us.

But every armchair quarterback who has likely never been in that position (and a few folks who should know better) chimed in with mostly finger pointing at the regular people in the band and the producer, calling THEM the unprofessional ones, and offering nothing in the way of solutions except completely unrealistic ones. Those of us who have been a longtime part of that world and know what it's like tried to set the record straight, only to keep getting shouted down by others who never existed in that world. And if you think this BL is unprofessional, I can tell you some stories, folks! Like or not, the BL calls the shots in his/her band, and if you don't like their behavior, they are never going to fire themselves.

Example 2 concerns a new bassist in a band of older players who's upset about the lead singer, who's usually been great, but who had too much to drink one night and got a little sloppy in a band where apparently everyone drinks on gigs but usually holds it together pretty well. Again, a few reasonable replies, but mostly a bunch of crap and nonsense about how this singer is a raging alcoholic, the bass player needs to confront him about it, and let him know that it's unacceptable. And in fine Talkbass tradition, there were a few replies that they need to fire the guy no questions asked.

First, the only thing anyone knows about this singer is what the new guy told us, which could be accurate or a gross misrepresentation of the facts and none of you would know the difference. The fact that so many people have diagnosed him as an alcoholic based on the bassist's OP makes me sick to my stomach, and it borders on libel. The OP needs to be extremely concerned about these comments adding up to libel, and he really needs to worry about it getting back to the rest of the band.

Second, the OP has said that the singer usually does a great job, but slipped this one night out of I don't know how many gigs they've done already, and didn't really start showing signs of slipping until later in the evening. The bar owner and staff were happy, the rest of the band didn't comment negatively about it, and the only one who seems unhappy is the OP, why may be justified in a little concern about a possible red flag. But of course, many people commented negatively about the singer's character as a human being, like any of them are perfect people who never ever did anything wrong in their lives. Spare me.

Third, let's examine the phrase "new guy" in more depth. Usually that means that you do less talking than listening, you be respectful of your new co-workers and try to assimilate into what they're already doing without making demands or pushing your own agenda until you've been there a good while, and if you don't like what's going on, then you either take a hike or you offer your opinion knowing full well that the end result could be them telling you to take a hike.

And some of you aren't going to like this, but while you might think you're extremely important to the success of a band with vocals as bassists (and make no mistake...some of you are), unless you can sing better than the lead singer and/or have a great ear for harmonies that they can't live without, you are not nearly as important as the lead singer, and even then you still may not be if they like him better than you. This goes double if you are the new guy, and it goes quadruple if you can't sing at all. And those of you who think it's OK to confront the lead singer in any way at this stage of the game are living in a world of delusion. Quit or keep quiet...those are a new guy's only two choices, and if you think otherwise, I dare you to try and prove me wrong.

Now add in the completely moronic barrage of replies to nearly every question on here with the advice to fire someone without any sort of rational analysis or thought of the repercussions ("Fire the drummer" is a joke on here now, but I remember when it wasn't), and now why you see why I always keep it light and never discuss any current issues I have with bands. I appreciate that there are some good and smart people on here who can offer up relevant and sage advice about how they handle certain situations. Some folks are extremely good at it. But I don't want so-called advice from inexperienced people who have never been outside of their house with a musical instrument, nor do I particularly care for advice from those who may be good experienced players but have never been in unique and uncommon performance situations such as what we have in example 1 or what I've done most of my career.

Sadly, I don't think it's ever going to change, though I keep hoping against hope. But if there's anything I can say to those who may recognize themselves as offenders on here to at least stem the tide a little, it would be these three things:

1. It's perfectly fine to have differences of opinion how to handle things, but truly consider what you're offering as advice, and make sure you've put at least a little thought into your replies.

2. We may all be equal in the eyes of the Lord or the law, but we are not all equal on the bandstand, so realize when you're out of your element. If you've never been in a situation someone is asking about, especially if it's regarding higher level performing situations than you've ever been a part of, you're best off to allow those who have been reply, and you just read and learn, otherwise you may do more harm than good.

3. Your words are public and easily searchable, so be very careful about the questions you ask or the comments you make when you start a thread, because I've seen it come back to bite people on the ass many times. It even came back on me once when I made what I thought was a comment that would never be seen by anyone but other bassists on an obscure bassist forum, and I was forced into damage control.

4. Everyone on here has egos to some degree, otherwise we wouldn't be here, and that is healthy and helps us do what we do without collapsing into a heap of self-doubt. But don't over-estimate the bass player's importance to the success of a project and give bad advice based on that very inaccurate assumption. Like it or not, pretty much all bands have pecking orders, and even the most democratic bands don't usually put bass players at number one unless they're the bandleader, and if you believe otherwise, you're fooling yourself.

5. NO ADVICE IS WAY BETTER THAN BAD ADVICE!

I posted this thread in the spirit of love and respect for those of you who share my love of playing music and entertaining people with the gift of music, and it's my sincere hope that all of you take it in that spirit, even if you might recognize yourself in some of these scenarios. But if you don't, all I can tell you is that if you think this post is bad, you should have seen my first and second drafts!!!
 
Last edited:
All excellent points...however the world of communication has changed with the advent of the interwebz and all of these concerns are seen in forums around the world covering every topic you could imagine. Go online amongst kids and you'd probably be shocked. There is a wonderful but false sense of anonymity that comes along with being online...but as you noted....it's illusory. TB is one of the rare forums that is actually really tightly moderated and has developed a relatively respectful culture. For the most part, little of what I read here incites an emotional response in me, but there are many other forums and social media locations which are not the case... :D
 
Great post Jimmy.

The only caveat is this. The vast majority of us will never be on stage in a room that holds more than a few hundred people. Most of us play in local bar bands. The chances of anyone locally being able to 1) find us or 2) know it's us if they do find us are slim.

But I get the spirit of your post and respect it.
 
It depends on how much of a "pro" you consider yourself. In the same way that we wouldn't go to our workplace and fly off the handle over every issue (and especially not write about the workplace online), pro players know that they have to treat performances with a modicum of professionalism and respect for their bandmates. Even if they're rolling their eyes on the inside.
 
...saw The Who back in the 1970s on the "Quadrophenia" tour at the Cow Palace in San Francisco. A while into the show, Keith Moon collapsed, completely blacked out on his drum riser, due to a bad combination of drink and drugs (reportedly.) This happened twice. After the second time, Pete Townshend asked if there was anyone in the audience who could take over the drums for a bit. Some kid (Luke Halprin, I think was his name) made his way to the stage, sat down at Keith's kit and actually sounded pretty damn good. Keith recovered, and finished the show.

Did The Who fire Keith?
 
...saw The Who back in the 1970s on the "Quadrophenia" tour at the Cow Palace in San Francisco. A while into the show, Keith Moon collapsed, completely blacked out on his drum riser, due to a bad combination of drink and drugs (reportedly.) This happened twice. After the second time, Pete Townshend asked if there was anyone who could take over the drums for a bit. Some kid (Luke Halprin, I think was his name) made his way to the stage, sat down at Keith's kit and actually sounded pretty damn good. Keith recovered, and finished the show.

Did The Who fire Keith?
Nothing personal, but it isn't the 70s, and we aren't the Who. And if he wasn't Keith Moon, he would have been gone.
 
Great post Jimmy.

The only caveat is this. The vast majority of us will never be on stage in a room that holds more than a few hundred people. Most of us play in local bar bands. The chances of anyone locally being able to 1) find us or 2) know it's us if they do find us are slim.

But I get the spirit of your post and respect it.
Fingers, that's exactly what I thought when I got busted :D I did mention the group's name in my post, though. I don't know...maybe you have a point. Maybe it's because I post quite non-anonymously and got busted on it once. Still, I think it's better to err on the side of caution.
 
Nothing personal, but it isn't the 70s, and we aren't the Who. And if he wasn't Keith Moon, he would have been gone.

Nothing personal, but I beg to differ. While I am not John Entwistle, and it is indeed not the 70s, and I am not a member of The Who, when I HAVE been in a long-standing band, I see them as my brothers (and sisters, as the case may be.) That's a "band" as opposed to being a sub. If someone messes up one time, or even two or three, that's no cue to dismiss them without a heart-to-heart.

I knew there would be a reply like this... "not Keith Moon." "Not The Who." BS. If you commit to a band, you don't summarily fire someone after one mistake. My opinion. YMMV.
 
So love of your co-workers and respect for what they bring to the table even if they're flawed is out now?

No, but there is a limit. Keith Moon was a fantastic drummer. If he didn't have the talent he did, he would have been axed, even in the indulgent 70s rock scene. From what I read, it was a question the band wrestled with. Same with Floyd and Sid Barrett. It was a hard decision, and he was obviously missed. Same with Brian Jones and the Stones. They were both loved and respected by their band mates. But they were fired.
 
Thanks for the post. I have to say that I actually enjoy some of the "complaining about the band" posts because even if they go off the rails sometimes, and even if I've never had a band situation anything like some of the ones I read about here, the stories remind me that I'm not alone in feeling frustration/disappointment/etc in a band. And I bet it feels good sometimes for folks to air some of those feelings. But I totally get your points about how that can also lead to hurt feelings, or misunderstanding.

But as a reader I don't always take these chat group discussions literally, directly, and concretely. Same as for what you might hear sitting around your local bar. I'm a grown up -- by now I hope I can usually sort out good advice from bad, wherever I hear it. Sometimes it can get overblown and that's when I pay up and leave. But sometimes it's good to know that we aren't alone in our victories and failures. That's when I buy another round.. :thumbsup:
 
No, but there is a limit. Keith Moon was a fantastic drummer. If he didn't have the talent he did, he would have been axed, even in the indulgent 70s rock scene. From what I read, it was a question the band wrestled with. Same with Floyd and Sid Barrett. It was a hard decision, and he was obviously missed. Same with Brian Jones and the Stones. They were both loved and respected by their band mates. But they were fired.
Brian Jones and Syd Barrett couldn't hold it together under any circumstances by then. Keith Moon, however, botched a handful of shows, but always did amazing work right up until the very end. And that is why Keith Richards is still in the Stones and Brian got the axe....Keith still held it together.
 
Brian Jones and Syd Barrett couldn't hold it together under any circumstances by then. Keith Moon, however, botched a handful of shows, but always did amazing work right up until the very end. And that is why Keith Richards is still in the Stones and Brian got the axe....Keith still held it together.

At times he did, and more than once concerts had to be cancelled (or they had to pull a teenager out of the audience to play).

If you ever find a book "Full Moon" (Moon the Loon in England), get it. I lost my copy. It was written by Moon's private assistant. Quite entertaining and enlightening.
 
Thanks for the post. I have to say that I actually enjoy some of the "complaining about the band" posts because even if they go off the rails sometimes, and even if I've never had a band situation anything like some of the ones I read about here, the stories remind me that I'm not alone in feeling frustration/disappointment/etc in a band. And I bet it feels good sometimes for folks to air some of those feelings. But I totally get your points about how that can also lead to hurt feelings, or misunderstanding.

But as a reader I don't always take these chat group discussions literally, directly, and concretely. Same as for what you might hear sitting around your local bar. I'm a grown up -- by now I hope I can usually sort out good advice from bad, wherever I hear it. Sometimes it can get overblown and that's when I pay up and leave. But sometimes it's good to know that we aren't alone in our victories and failures. That's when I buy another round.. :thumbsup:
Oh, don't get me wrong...I enjoy those posts, too :D But I've seen it lead to bad things. And what I don't enjoy is people giving horribly bad advice. Not everyone knows good advice from bad. Add that to a goodly amount of advice playing to an inexperienced player's ego rather than being what they need to hear, and once they get bad advice that reinforces their thoughts, they're not going to care about the 100 posts saying otherwise.

OTOH, I guess that's not my problem, nor should I care. They're going to make their own mistakes anyway. Still, I try to help. If it falls on deaf ears, so be it.