P-ODDZ, you might want to reconsider Slipknot. Iowa was the epitome of mediocrity, but after that they really started making music, IMO.
As I said, I understand what you mean about a lack of innovation and being fed up with generic cr@p. Loads of that going around. I still rediscover Iron Maiden on a regular basis and don't feel that the genre really "needs" anything new in order for me to enjoy the oldies, but yeah, as the amount of rubbish grows the scales tip towards an image of metal as overall poor quality. Sad that.
There are a few points always coming up that I am wondering about; why would someone claim that they dislike metal and the go on to praise the bands that define the genre. Sorry Powderfinger, but as I see it Sabbath, Maiden, Megadeth, Metallica, Slayer, Dio, Motörhead and so on are not classic rock. If anything they are classic metal. It seems to me that a great many people assume metal means death metal, or some more extreme and/or obscure genre. Metal is almost as broad as rock!
Another thing is the whole youth thing. I always preferred rock over metal and so i never really wore the uniform, but I have a great many friends in the metal society who still lose the suit and tie to whip out the black wardrobe whenever there is a concert nearby. There are youths too, sure, but as with anything else some youths look into it for a while and then let it go while others fall in love and stay true. The average age is probably around 20-30 with extremes at both ends of the spectrum (lots of parents bring their kids in those tiny Maiden shirts). Is this situation very different from what you see in America?
As I said, I understand what you mean about a lack of innovation and being fed up with generic cr@p. Loads of that going around. I still rediscover Iron Maiden on a regular basis and don't feel that the genre really "needs" anything new in order for me to enjoy the oldies, but yeah, as the amount of rubbish grows the scales tip towards an image of metal as overall poor quality. Sad that.
There are a few points always coming up that I am wondering about; why would someone claim that they dislike metal and the go on to praise the bands that define the genre. Sorry Powderfinger, but as I see it Sabbath, Maiden, Megadeth, Metallica, Slayer, Dio, Motörhead and so on are not classic rock. If anything they are classic metal. It seems to me that a great many people assume metal means death metal, or some more extreme and/or obscure genre. Metal is almost as broad as rock!
Another thing is the whole youth thing. I always preferred rock over metal and so i never really wore the uniform, but I have a great many friends in the metal society who still lose the suit and tie to whip out the black wardrobe whenever there is a concert nearby. There are youths too, sure, but as with anything else some youths look into it for a while and then let it go while others fall in love and stay true. The average age is probably around 20-30 with extremes at both ends of the spectrum (lots of parents bring their kids in those tiny Maiden shirts). Is this situation very different from what you see in America?

