TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Look at the chord in the thread poster's avatar.
You don't *have* to go lower than E...
I wonder where john turner is....

rehearsing. on my unnecessary erb's.![]()

Forget about whether it's mainstream or not. Just be true to yourself.
And most amplification can handle the low F#.

Are there any good reasons why 5 and 6 string basses are so popular?
E seems plenty low enough and I don't understand why anyone would want a wider neck. Is it just a fad or craze?
Well, I've stopped to read through this thread a few times today but I have been playing bass and sax and recording and doing other things. I figured this wouldn't be the first time this has been discussed, but I haven't seen any threads about it since I joined. My question was if there were any "good reasons" for more strings. The only "good" one I see is about the need to compete with the keyboard synth bass capabilities in the 80s. Sure there's more range and you can stay in one position and there's the resonance of the big lows, but that's just bells and whistles or fun stuff or personal preference. That's cool, whatever floats your boat. I'm certain now that 4 is enough for me, thanks.
As mr. Eastwood would say "A man's got to know his limitations"As mr. Eastwood would say "A man's got to know his limitations"
![]()
More strings makes you a better player? Good for you.
More strings makes you a better player? Good for you.