In my experience none of this is true. There were plenty of tube failures back in the "good 'ol days".
In some ways, some tubes are even better today, and up until recently they were less expensive than the "good 'ol days" when inflation is factored in. Quite a bit less expensive.
Well if I'm understanding you correct you are dealing with amps as a manufacturer? Of course yours would be a different experience as you're seeing hundreds (thousands?) of amps. And if you're associated with Mesa(?), perhaps they hadn't made a tube that works well in those amps and your designs were hard on tubes?
I'm talking from a user's POV. Which in the scheme of things has some merit. Since there are more of us than there are of you. Today still as a user if a tube fails now when it didn't before and repair companies of amps that were around since the 60's using 6550 and certain preamp tubes complain of failures like EH Tungsol (where Tungsol was what the factory put in as standard in these particular 40 watt amps) then the failure is definitely higher than what it was in the "good old days."
I still have the Tungsol USA 6550 pair that was in this type/brand of amp from the factory back in the 60's and it was run balls to the walls 4 hours a night 6 days a week for years. The amp from where these tubes came still worked great without repair when I sold it a few years ago.
Just a few years ago the same type amp using a pair of 6550 was rebuilt and Svetlanas were installed circa 2005. The Svetlanas failed after a few years. A pair of Sovteks were installed and although there was a difference in tone, they've lasted till today even though with major concert use.
There was this article on "hard vacuuming" that came out long ago describing how tube makers were trying to decide how to go about this process and if they should "soft vacuum" or even add certain gases to the tube and the hard vacuuming is what they went with that had something to do with a certain pump that achieved this. This vacuum process took a while in production which meant each tube spent more time in the assembly line.
Today a single USA Tungsol 6550 made back in the 20th is $400 per tube.
Tung-Sol 6550 ST NOS-U.S. Made
Made today $90 per tube.
Tung-Sol 6550
By the start of the 70's (isn't that when Mesa came into being?) things started to go down hill as regards tubes. So if you as an amp factory were receiving batches of tubes made after the 60's that were defective or not to your spec, then one can see why your experience was what it was.
I don't consider someone who abused amplifiers (yeah that's how you got your tone) as the touchstone for a tube's longevity, more the exception than the norm. That type of usage would appear as using up the life of the tube like burning a candle at both ends.
Last edited: