@scubaduba your compressor reviews are phenomenal![]()
I concur! Thank you @scubaduba!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
@scubaduba your compressor reviews are phenomenal![]()
Was hoping for a audio/track comparison between the two. Oh well.Nope
Already read the review, thanks. Was talking about sound samples.Between the Oracle and SLO? OK
https://www.compressorpedalreviews.com/arkham-oracle-tube-preamp-review
Ahhh. Sound samples. The mythical Talkbass unicorn.Already read the review, thanks. Was talking about sound samples.
They do exist.Ahhh. Sound samples. The mythical Talkbass unicorn.
They do exist.
I've seen one "good" Zephyr video that I will listen to when I have some better equipment available. However, when differences, that are described as being likely to not be noticed in a mix, are being sought after an A/B comparison is leaps and bounds above the rest. Even with these wimpy computer speakers that I have listened to the Zephyr demo through, I can tell that it sounds good. But I'm not willing to sell off things and commit the funds based on it.I believe @chadhargis has posted clips of the SLO and a few others in the preamp/di thread, but not the Oracle. I could be wrong. Oracle is similar to the Zephyr. There's some youtube videos for that. I don't think there are any direct comparison clips though.
I believe @chadhargis has posted clips of the SLO and a few others in the preamp/di thread, but not the Oracle. I could be wrong. Oracle is similar to the Zephyr. There are some youtube videos for that. I don't think there are any direct comparison clips though.
You should....I don't think I'll ever part with my Oracle. It's the first tube pedal I've ever had that reacts to my playing like a tube amp wouldAll the Oracle talk has me wondering if I should part with the SLO and use the Oracle with the OCSD...
I unfortunately had to sell off most of my board about 6 months ago when my wife was out of work. We got back up and my board is now complete! Forever! (Ha ya right)
All clean, wired up, and ready to go! Literally plug and play - plug into the right inputs, out of the DI or 1/4" out on the rockboard patch bay. Power in. Booyah. Also have a usb outlet tucked in the corner by my AOU xlr for plugging in my synth. Multi purpose: works for Bass, Acoustic Guitar, and some Synth stuff I'm playing with.
Bass/acoustic: input > bloomery vp > mxr comp > b3k > hx effects > DI Underboard *acoustic DI's from here* > di through to AOU (bass DI from here)
Synth Pads: synth input (directly into hx return 1) > into acoustic DI (If playing bass) or through to the AOU (if playing acoustic)
View attachment 3761879 View attachment 3761877 View attachment 3761881
I read somewhere that the HX effects doesn't have IR capabilities...is that true?
I did recently add a Rupert Neve DI and I can tell a bit of a difference between it and using the SLO's DI.
Something to keep in mind from the RNDI manual:How is your experience with the RNDI i.t.o. noise? I'm thinking it's probably dead silent?
I'm thinking of ordering either the RNDI or SLO to replace my Darkglass Alpha Omega Ultra - its DI hiss issue has drawn comments from every sound guy at every venue I've played and I've no need for the broad range of distortion it has to offer any more (I've fallen in love with the tone of my flatwounds, and the AOU's drive/distortion sounds better with roundwounds - just my opinion).
I'll be running a Harmonic Booster -> SuperSymmetry -> DI from a JMJ Mustang bass with flatwounds, so a very basic setup at this point (saving up for the HX Stomp in future), but I'm torn between the clean, great sound of the RNDI vs. the tube goodness that the SLO will add (and option of drive if needed).