• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Worst chronic bass design flaws?

Got to be truss rod adjustment for me. Especially on my beloved Fenders. Having to take the neck off is a serious pain.

Yup...this right here.

I've always wondered why Leo thought that a set-up adjustment that necessitates string removal and neck unbolting was a good idea.

Only two of my Fenders are heel adjusting, and I've notched my pickguard to overcome that flaw. I'm thinking of building my own this autumn, and one of the "must-have" features is a spoke wheel truss adjustment. Aside from the convenience factor, you can make slight adjustments in a very measured way.
 
$0.02

+1 Neck Dive
+1 Truss rod adjustment
+1 Bulky neck heel
+1 Fret dressing
+1 Lack of shielding
+1 Unbalanced tone across strings
+1 Badly/non set up instruments to retail

I'd throw in pick-up placement FWIW. A lot of 'new' designs catch this, but a lot don't.
(just an opinion, but wouldn't the Precision p'up sound better if the poles on the E & A were closer to the bridge?)
 
Man, I don't know about universal, but the craziest design flaw ever in a bass that I've seen was the bridge spacing on the Fender MIA J's from the late '80's / early 90's (the "boner" basses / Longhorns)...... It's like 21.5mm..... you couldn't keep the E or G strings on the fret board. Absolutely killer, quality instruments from a manufacturing point of view...... I've never played a bass with a tighter neck pocket. And Fender kept the bridge like that through the life cycle of the longhorns.

I never understood why they didn't use the bridges from the Deluxe Jazz.
 
Personally, I hate that basses don't come with a straplock system by default. On both of my basses and my guitar my dad and I have applied far too much effort getting straplocks installed, and the crummy little strap buttons that are on basses by default never work for me for an extended period.

I thank God that basses don't come with strap lock systems. I hate strap locks. Just get a rubber washer and place over the strap--quiet and effective.
 
As much as I agree with the idea of Steinbergers being super efficient designs, I gotta say-looks DO matter, and that thing got beat with an ugly stick. If they started making all basses to be as comfortable and efficient as possible, I think we'd all be missing out on a very important aspect of playing, which is aesthetic.
 
It sounds like there is a general consensus about neck dive and weight. Here is my solution, headstocks are a universal design flaw. They are entirely unnecessary from a design perspective.

Thus the solution---

Invalid Link Removed


Ned Steinberger was a genius, he saw what a bass really needed and didn't need. I think half of the people on this thread would love to play one of these bad boys, even if they hated it, if you get my drift.

Steinberger might be a genius, but that legrest he sells under license is just…[insert extreme negative swearword]. Otherwise, these kind of basses are frequently needing adjustments (like pictured in your post) for correct strap fit and for correcting the body diving (on a horizontal axis)