TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
on the dvd that comes with power corruption and lies definitive edition, there is coverage of a june 1982 gig at the hacienda and he's clearly shown playing the village on the bb1200.
I'm definitely interested in a comparison between the BBPH and the BB734A, particularly the differences in tone with the "p" pickup. I imagine subtle differences with the reverse pickup on the BBPH, but just how different are the preamps? I've been very interested in the BBPH, but is it worth getting if you already own a BB724A?My thoughts on the BBPH (haven't had chance to try one yet or the 734a):
Really pleased to finally see a reverse P BB come out!
The original pick up ring and oval inlays would have been the icing on the cake, but not a deal breaker for me
I'd love to see a sunburst version come out too, either in passive or with the same electronics. There were some other v well known bassists who were also associated with these, which i'm surprised Yamaha doesn't acknowledge:
View attachment 4088029 View attachment 4088032
Anyone else had chance to try both a BBPH and 734a yet?
Yep, and the New York 1981 gig which i guess isn't too much of a surprise as one was featured in the LWTUA video.
On the debate around the BB600 and whether Hooky just has poor memory on this. I don't know what year the BB VI came out, but could he be confusing the name BB VI - BB600? They do look identical to a BB1200, at least to my eyes (although it looks like there is a non reverse version too). I often see used ones come up for sale in japan, like this one currently on the 'bay
View attachment 4088017 View attachment 4088018
Yamaha honestly probably doesn't know. They didn't know Hooky played the BB1200S for most of his career until Jack, his son, told them.My thoughts on the BBPH (haven't had chance to try one yet or the 734a):
Really pleased to finally see a reverse P BB come out!
The original pick up ring and oval inlays would have been the icing on the cake, but not a deal breaker for me
I'd love to see a sunburst version come out too, either in passive or with the same electronics. There were some other v well known bassists who were also associated with these, which i'm surprised Yamaha doesn't acknowledge:
View attachment 4088029 View attachment 4088032
Anyone else had chance to try both a BBPH and 734a yet?
If anyone is still looking for one there's one available on Reverb from Gerald Music Online, from Canada but I'm pretty sure they ship to the US.

I agree. The new BBs are still great basses but the original MIJ BBs are really something else. I don't even know if they can be compared to anything else on the market. The BB1200, the BB1200S, and the BB2000 are the best three basses Yamaha ever made, and they never surpassed them, in my opinion.Yamaha fronted basses to the famous, as they all do, another guy with a BB1200:
View attachment 4088158
I somehow doubt he kept that B100 Bass rig for very long . . . .
. . . . who I think generally found as I did (I owned two back in the day) that while they were remarkably well-built instruments, the necks ran thick and they could be heavy, but were a wonderful alternative take on the PBass formula. That honey-tinted clear with dark red highlights sunburst they used was one of my favorite finishes, and the great visual cue was the neckthru stripes running thru the face of the peghead.
For me, that generation of BB Yamahas will never be reached again, even by Yamaha themselves. Like all the Japanese manufacturers, they establish a brand, then ruthlessly re-invent it over and over, until only the name is the same. The current BB's are exceptional for sure, but they will never match those 80's MIJ BB's in my heart.
Yamaha honestly probably doesn't know. They didn't know Hooky played the BB1200S for most of his career until Jack, his son, told them.
Just this part here I was referring to, sorry should have edited the rest out when I initially quoted it. I mean that they (being Yamaha) probably aren't even aware of the other well known bassists who used the BBs.There were some other v well known bassists who were also associated with these, which i'm surprised Yamaha doesn't acknowledge
Yamaha fronted basses to the famous, as they all do, another guy with a BB1200:
View attachment 4088158
I somehow doubt he kept that B100 Bass rig for very long . . . .
. . . . who I think generally found as I did (I owned two back in the day) that while they were remarkably well-built instruments, the necks ran thick and they could be heavy, but were a wonderful alternative take on the PBass formula. That honey-tinted clear with dark red highlights sunburst they used was one of my favorite finishes, and the great visual cue was the neckthru stripes running thru the face of the peghead.
.
That's one of my gripes about the BB734A (and the P34), why does the entry level BB234 have 4 color options, but the higher end BB734A and BBP34 only have 2?I know the red one is Hooky's favourite colour, but it would be great to see the BBPH in other colour variants. Same goes for the BB734A, which seems only to be available in black and dark coffee burst.
historically, yamaha generally offer two colors per model. it's surprising they offer 4 at all.
To be fair, that is accurate to the old BBs too. The BB1200, 2000, and 1200S all only have two options. Sunburst and natural for the 1200 and 2000 and burgundy and green for the 1200S. Still though, why offer more for the cheaper basses and less for the high end ones?Depends on the line. The TRBX300 series has six(!) color options, the 400 and 600 lines have four. It really is only the higher BBs that have just two.