...I'm curious about how you see the usability of the EQ effects with this pedal in following scenario: Practising in 2-3 different places and there's the occasional gigs too. Pedal setup with the patches and effects. Then I'd only need to adjust eq according to the room, would I need to go through every patch and make the needed adjustment.
I trade a lot of gear, but I’m pretty careful and rarely if ever have any regrets.
One that does bug me, was letting go of my Empress Para EQ. Having a really high quality EQ that you can place after everything else in your signal chain without any tone suck, can be incredibly useful.
The good news, is that you can still occasionally find them used for around $200.
So why have I never replaced it? Because there are so many ways to grab some post EQ these days.
The form factor stinks in comparison to the MS-60B, but the master tone and boost knobs on my Zoom G5n are pretty useful, and you can pick up a used one for well under $200.
Plus you get a ton of other interesting stuff like parametric and graphic EQ’s, amps, cabs, overdrives, reverbs, delays, an expression pedal, etc., as well.
Another great $200 option for a gigging bassist, is a G-K MB200 head. Sized about the same as a large pedal, you get a terrific 4-band, bass-oriented EQ that comes with it’s own built-in AC power supply. They also throw in a few useful gimmicks like a decent DI, extra audio inputs and outputs, and a punchy 200 watt power amplifier. How can you go wrong?
At a lower price point, you can say the same for a used B3n, which just might convince you to drop the MS-60B altogether. Drop a little further in price, and you can grab a second MS-60. Ditto for a B1on.