TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Peavey Cirrus 5......no extra comment needed1
I also offer 35" scale 5 string basses.Valenti makes a great 34" scale 5-strings. My experience with Sadowsky 5ers is limited to playing every Metro I could a couple of years ago, but Metro's are GREAT.
I actually find that overall construction is much more important than scale length in regards to a good B.
I also offer 35" scale 5 string basses.
If anyone knows of a 34" that gets a good sustaining clear B string, that would be greeat too!
Thanks!

Well, what can I say that hasn't already been said? I have three (3) five string basses with a Low B that I really like. And I've owned plenty of others, most for more than a year.
Modulus Q5 - 35"
Lakland DJ5 - 35"
AND in regards to your question
Roscoe LG 3005 - 34"
I can vouch for the Roscoe low B, personally. It sounds particularly juicy!
The 34" scale was a special request, I believe the LG 3005 generally comes as 35" standard. But paying that much for a bass not made to your specs is jive, ya dig?![]()
+1 The best B string I've heard is on the Modulus Quantum, which happens to be 35" scale, but I attribute the clarity to the graphite composite neck.
I forgot to note that the Dingwall fan is absolutely brilliant. I'm very likely to order a fanned 7 by Cliff Bordwell sometime in the near future.
Longer is better for the lower strings (B, E and A) but not for the higher (D and G). However one inch of difference is not going to be noticeable simply by listening. Especially in a band situation.OK you started the 35" debate again , LOL. I'm a firm believer that as far as tone and feel go, longer is better. I won't repeat myself more, except to state my opinion that until you've played a Dingwall, you haven't heard your best B.
Longer is better for the lower strings (B, E and A) but not for the higher (D and G). However one inch of difference is not going to be noticeable simply by listening. Especially in a band situation.
+1. I tried a few at the NAMM show. Surprised that the fanned frets were actually really easy to get used to. String lengths on one of the basses went 37" on the b up to 32" on the G. Or something like this. The basses were really wonderful to play. Would have liked to play them in a place that had less than 130db noise.
For me, it's really down to the type of string, rather than the scale length so much. I've had basses in 33", 34" and 35" scale and all have good B's if I use a good brand of string.
LM
OK, call me a troublemaker: your tone is more than just the B-string. For years I struggled to get a good, warm, *overall* tone out of a 35" scale--what a waste of time and effort.
I'm back at 34" with my Fender Jazz 5 Roscoe Beck signature, and it's perfect--only 5-string I'll ever need. I saw my error, and I'm never going back.
I suggest you reconsider.