• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

All Things Must Beat. Share Anything Beatles!!

An interesting interview that I watch had George complaining that he had very little to do with Pepper. He contributed one song, where he made some publishing money, Within You and Without You. Only A Northern Song was turned down. He said that after India in 1966 he didn’t want to be Fab any more. That was George just being George.

John said that he didn’t see it as a concept album. The songs could have been on any album, there was no thread. He said that Pet Sounds did a better job as a concept album.

Ringo said that his most memorable experience durning Pepper was learning to play chess. He had a lot of down time.

It was all down to Paul. Turns out, it sold well. As did Abbey Road, their one last chance to do it again as a band.
 
Yeah, if you're counting Paul as the second one. :rolleyes:
.

5C8F5C29-A88D-4D10-AF77-2B82ACAB2A89.jpeg
 


You're right, of course. But, I thought it may have been a bit too subtle for some younger fans.

I was also wondering if there just might be another short-term Beatle bassist who had slipped under my radar, like Chas Newby did. I'm an avid fan since '63, but I don't recall ever hearing of Chas before his passing. :oops:
.
 
You're right, of course. But, I thought it may have been a bit too subtle for some younger fans.

I was also wondering if there just might be another short-term Beatle bassist who had slipped under my radar, like Chas Newby did. I'm an avid fan since '63, but I don't recall ever hearing of Chas before his passing. :oops:
.
Subtle? I thought the whole Paul is dead/Billy Shears thing and all the BS about “clues” was a big part of their mythology.
 
An interesting interview that I watch had George complaining that he had very little to do with Pepper. He contributed one song, where he made some publishing money, Within You and Without You. Only A Northern Song was turned down. He said that after India in 1966 he didn’t want to be Fab any more. That was George just being George.

John said that he didn’t see it as a concept album. The songs could have been on any album, there was no thread. He said that Pet Sounds did a better job as a concept album.

Ringo said that his most memorable experience durning Pepper was learning to play chess. He had a lot of down time.

It was all down to Paul. Turns out, it sold well. As did Abbey Road, their one last chance to do it again as a band.
this one?
 
Maybe in the 70s. But it's not as if anyone would fall for it these days.
That malarky was well over with by the spring of 1970. It hit the news cycle in the fall of ‘69, right about the time of the release of Abbey Road. The rumor had its origins on Detroit underground FM radio, IIRC.

After all that died down, with attention spans being what they are(even back then), fans were focused on coming to grips with, and wrapping their minds around, the fact that The Beatles were kaput. But it still remains an interesting facet of their career, and a study of mass hysteria, widespred rumor, and misinformation. Oh, and don’t kid yourself, people these days do fall for that kind of crap in general; it surrounds us.

Lennon referenced the phenomenon as part of his dig at Paul on “How Do You Sleep”.
 
... ... I thought the whole Paul is dead/Billy Shears thing and all the BS about “clues” was a big part of their mythology.

Maybe in the 70s. But it's not as if anyone would fall for it these days.

That malarky was well over with by the spring of 1970. It hit the news cycle in the fall of ‘69, right about the time of the release of Abbey Road. The rumor had its origins on Detroit underground FM radio, IIRC.

After all that died down, with attention spans being what they are(even back then), fans were focused on coming to grips with, and wrapping their minds around, the fact that The Beatles were kaput. But it still remains an interesting facet of their career, and a study of mass hysteria, widespred rumor, and misinformation. Oh, and don’t kid yourself, people these days do fall for that kind of crap in general; it surrounds us.

Lennon referenced the phenomenon as part of his dig at Paul on “How Do You Sleep”.


I consider it to be a quirky minor part of The Beatles story, since it actually is mythology. I believe it started as early as '66 and peaked around '69-ish, before evolving into the joke that it really is. The "clues" that are its foundation fall into the same category as the "messages" that Charlie Manson got from The Beatles to lead his "family", which proves the old adage that, "You can fool some of the people all of the time, ... etc., etc." :meh:
.
 
Last edited:
That malarky was well over with by the spring of 1970. It hit the news cycle in the fall of ‘69, right about the time of the release of Abbey Road. The rumor had its origins on Detroit underground FM radio, IIRC.

After all that died down, with attention spans being what they are(even back then), fans were focused on coming to grips with, and wrapping their minds around, the fact that The Beatles were kaput. But it still remains an interesting facet of their career, and a study of mass hysteria, widespred rumor, and misinformation. Oh, and don’t kid yourself, people these days do fall for that kind of crap in general; it surrounds us.

Lennon referenced the phenomenon as part of his dig at Paul on “How Do You Sleep”.
I can’t believe how complex the whole “Paul is Dead” storyline is. It was interesting at the time but I never thought that he was dead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nixdad and G-Dog
That malarky was well over with by the spring of 1970. It hit the news cycle in the fall of ‘69, right about the time of the release of Abbey Road. The rumor had its origins on Detroit underground FM radio, IIRC.

After all that died down, with attention spans being what they are(even back then), fans were focused on coming to grips with, and wrapping their minds around, the fact that The Beatles were kaput. But it still remains an interesting facet of their career, and a study of mass hysteria, widespred rumor, and misinformation. Oh, and don’t kid yourself, people these days do fall for that kind of crap in general; it surrounds us.

Lennon referenced the phenomenon as part of his dig at Paul on “How Do You Sleep”.
Indeed, it’s truly amazing the human desire to believe in myths, throughout history. I’m sure it’s been well-studied. As you say, it hasn’t abated any over time. Just look around.
 

Latest posts