• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ambient/Post-Rock/Textural bass playing thread

it can be that. And it’s fast. I also hate programming drums which is why I gave it up. But maybe I will now. Send me some drum samples you like and I’ll make something so you can hear what it would be like.

Edit: forgot my reason for posting: am I right that the WMD Geiger Counter is a fantastic pedal and worth my while?
I had a Geiger counter. I sold it.
Anything in particular you would like to know about the pedal??
I experimented A Lot!!! With it so ask away.
I liked it but not enough for it to be a keeper.
 
mostly as a wavetable-based waveshaper/distortion

I'm mainly interested for the wave shaping rather than bit or sample reduction, and for synths rather than bass. Seems like it would be good for my Perfourmer and/or 208c to get some less traditional sounds. And apparently the last version is capable of subtle as well as over the top sounds. So, yes, please tell me about your experience with it. The maker is selling the last few of the final version and I'm curious. I don't buy a lot of pedals anymore but I do feel like special flavours of distortion are...special and harder to replicate through other means. I messed around with a Red Panda Bitmap sometime back but felt it was more about the bit and sample manipulation and the wave folding / wave shaping was a secondary feature.

I liked it but not enough for it to be a keeper.

You both sold it -- can you say more about why? TIA!
 
It's been a while honestly. The input level is absolutely key, it's extremely responsive to dynamics. Theoretically if you feed it a sawtooth with exactly the right gain it will produce exactly whatever wave is in the bank; more than that and it does a sort of folding effect.

There are lots of things that can do this. I first played with it on the ER-301 Sound Computer, then on SynthTech E352. Piston Honda and Shapeshifter let you do it too and there are probably others -- any wavetable VCO where you can completely stall the oscillator, or at least drop to a very slow LFO rate, then drive a phase or TZFM input with an audio signal. Xaoc Jena is basically wavetable lookup for their Liebniz system (I had some issues with it but they've apparently done a firmware update recently). In Bitwig Grid, you can do the same trick with the Wavetable module (or their new stuff whose name I forget, the sort of unified MSEG/waveshaper thing).

What I had was the standard Geiger Counter pedal, but in a black colorway (it didn't look like the LE version of GC Pro they have listed right now). It's possible than when I sold mine, that was when I was generally bailing out of pedals. I was half tempted by the Eurorack version of Geiger Counter, but CV control didn't seem that useful (while an input VCA might have been really handy).
 
I'm mainly interested for the wave shaping rather than bit or sample reduction, and for synths rather than bass. Seems like it would be good for my Perfourmer and/or 208c to get some less traditional sounds. And apparently the last version is capable of subtle as well as over the top sounds. So, yes, please tell me about your experience with it. The maker is selling the last few of the final version and I'm curious. I don't buy a lot of pedals anymore but I do feel like special flavours of distortion are...special and harder to replicate through other means. I messed around with a Red Panda Bitmap sometime back but felt it was more about the bit and sample manipulation and the wave folding / wave shaping was a secondary feature.



You both sold it -- can you say more about why? TIA!
I’ll do bullet point more cavemen type pf answer
I had the “normal version”. not the pro, civilian or bass model.
the yellow and red one

- as previously mentioned the input is really a pain in the @$$, takes a long time to balance the input gain right to any wavetable.
- forget using it live, any tweak of a millimetre of any knob changes the sound, so getting a setting you liked recalled is quite the chore even with a picture with your cellphone of the settings.
- a lot of the wavetables sound the same, lots of overlap
- lack of clean blend. I usually hate clean blends on dirt pedals but on the Geiger Counter it was a must.
So I had to boot up my DAW with an extra track whenever I used the pedal. Always try phase flipping the tracks btw!!
- imo, any of the subtle settings where “meh” sounding. its not called WMD for nothing (weapons of mass destruction)
- must mention that I’m not a big fan of bitcrushers, once below 8bits they all sound the same.

sold it, zero regrets.
 
since rush came up . . . whatever opinion you may have about rush, this is kind of a beautiful little interview.

Rush's Geddy Lee: 'I had a childhood full of stories about death and murder'

"Rush was Led Zeppelin for Dungeons & Dragons fans."

Uh, Led Zeppelin was Led Zeppelin for D&D fans, with songs like Ramble On, Misty Mountain Hop, etc. Rush had, as far as I can remember one song that directly references Tolkien (Rivendell) , Zeppelin had a few.

Just putting that out there. Also, if Geddy were as good-looking as Robert Plant, Rush would've had way more female fans. Looks and sex appeal counts as much as talent. Just a fact of the music business. If Jim Morrison had been ugly, the Doors would be just another forgotten band from the 60s liked mostly by dudes.

I know the article wasn't being critical, but as a giant Rush dork with a Star Trek avatar I am sensitive and always spoiling for a fight!
 
"Rush was Led Zeppelin for Dungeons & Dragons fans."

Uh, Led Zeppelin was Led Zeppelin for D&D fans, with songs like Ramble On, Misty Mountain Hop, etc. Rush had, as far as I can remember one song that directly references Tolkien (Rivendell) , Zeppelin had a few.

Just putting that out there. Also, if Geddy were as good-looking as Robert Plant, Rush would've had way more female fans. Looks and sex appeal counts as much as talent. Just a fact of the music business. If Jim Morrison had been ugly, the Doors would be just another forgotten band from the 60s liked mostly by dudes.

I know the article wasn't being critical, but as a giant Rush dork with a Star Trek avatar I am sensitive and always spoiling for a fight!

i thought that was somewhat tongue in cheek.

what i dug about the interview is that lee's humanity was front and center.
 
What's Ableton? :D

:laugh: Me when people start talking about DAWs and soft synths and anything else that happens on a computer:

iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: Starthief and JES