• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ambient/Post-Rock/Textural bass playing thread

on the erskine thing, how does one interpret where strings are, etc.?
He breaks it down in text form, but each row of blocks is a string. So in the first shape from the screenshot the root is on the B string, the 7th on the G, the 3rd on the C. Definitely a physical stretch for someone like me, but I included it more as an example of how he lays out a bunch of chord options in the book
 
He breaks it down in text form, but each row of blocks is a string. So in the first shape from the screenshot the root is on the B string, the 7th on the G, the 3rd on the C. Definitely a physical stretch for someone like me, but I included it more as an example of how he lays out a bunch of chord options in the book
Yep, I definitely can’t do that chord shape comfortably. Ouch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeorock
ditto. all good.

in terms of post-rock and all that, i’ve been thinking about electric bass is general:

my belief is that electric bass needs to break out of the only groove and roots thing. that may be where it came from, but the potential is there for much, much more. i view it as a platform for a great number of musical/expressive possibilities (which can include groove/roots thing).

so, for me, at some point it’s useful to think about what you want to hear and go about realizing that vision, not just doing what other people have done in the past.

hopefully this makes some sense.
 
ditto. all good.

in terms of post-rock and all that, i’ve been thinking about electric bass is general:

my belief is that electric bass needs to break out of the only groove and roots thing. that may be where it came from, but the potential is there for much, much more. i view it as a platform for a great number of musical/expressive possibilities (which can include groove/roots thing).

so, for me, at some point it’s useful to think about what you want to hear and go about realizing that vision, not just doing what other people have done in the past.

hopefully this makes some sense.
IMO Tom Jenskinson aka Squarepusher has been doing that since the early 90s.
I true freakin monster of a genius if you ask me. WAAYAYAYAYAYA beyond underated.
But I’m a fanboy....so .....
 
there are a few people who have been doing that.

tbh, most of what i've heard of his on bass (small sample size admittedly) has been post-jaco shredding or really fast slap stuff. but then maybe i need to hear some other stuff. (and i've heard some of his free improv with some of the london free improv guys and it left me pretty cold.)
 
there are a few people who have been doing that.

tbh, most of what i've heard of his on bass (small sample size admittedly) has been post-jaco shredding or really fast slap stuff. but then maybe i need to hear some other stuff. (and i've heard some of his free improv with some of the london free improv guys and it left me pretty cold.)
I was thinking more along the lines of his full albums. When he blurs the line between what is man, bass or machine....like on the album Ultravisitor.

Not a huge fan either of his solo bass albums but at least he tries something new and takes risks. That I really like. He could have easily put out boring drill and bass and made more $$.
 
(I've posted about him everywhere else on TB, so why not here too...)

Check out Colin Marston's bass playing with Gorguts (for example). Not post-rock, but he's definitely not just hammering away at roots and fifths. Here's an example:

totally, not just roots and so forth.

but . . . . i assume this is not just a drums and bass duo, is that correct? so is he doubling the guitars? if so, and he's not the writer, that implies that he is subservient to the guitar players . . . supplying "groove" or what-have-you.

if he is the writer, it gets into a whole different thing. (maybe the guitars are doubling him.)

i guess what i'm advocating is a world where more bass players concern themselves with being band leaders and stretching the boundaries of what the instrument can do—and breaking the dogmatic strictures of what they're supposed to do . . .

yes, i have an agenda. :)
 
totally, not just roots and so forth.

but . . . . i assume this is not just a drums and bass duo, is that correct? so is he doubling the guitars? if so, and he's not the writer, that implies that he is subservient to the guitar players . . . supplying "groove" or what-have-you.

if he is the writer, it gets into a whole different thing. (maybe the guitars are doubling him.)

i guess what i'm advocating is a world where more bass players concern themselves with being band leaders and stretching the boundaries of what the instrument can do—and breaking the dogmatic strictures of what they're supposed to do . . .

yes, i have an agenda. :)
Similar style of playing, but just bass and drums here:
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeorock
I was thinking more along the lines of his full albums. When he blurs the line between what is man, bass or machine....like on the album Ultravisitor.

Not a huge fan either of his solo bass albums but at least he tries something new and takes risks. That I really like. He could have easily put out boring drill and bass and made more $$.

thanks for the album tip. yeah, much more to my taste musically . . . big bonus points for ridiculous bass playing. the real deal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ugly_bassplayer