Still can't figure out why the girl I was with that night didn't marry me...
her loss
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Still can't figure out why the girl I was with that night didn't marry me...
For the record: Not only have I puked and @%##* at the same time, but I was sitting on the toilet @%##*ing at the time and so I wound up puking into my pants.
Still can't figure out why the girl I was with that night didn't marry me...
so, about the Octatrack........
Any reason to consider the Samples? Other than to save a few bucks.
Stomach flu since Monday.
Someone end me.
Can finally hold fluids for the 1st time in 48 hours
Ugh. I feel your pain, literally. Side effect of the cancer drugs is all sorts of intestinal problems. I've had the sh*ts (and exquisite cramps) on and off for 10 days now. Really exhausting.
Digitakt doesn't do stereo sampling.I’ve heard some great music done on the Samples and Cycles. Together they make a formidable groovebox kinda thing. Simplicity can be nice at times. I’d personally go with the Digitakt. You can sample into it (can only load files from the computer on Model:Samples) and you get an 8 track Elektron midi sequencer in addition to the 8 sampler channels. 16 tracks of great sequencing power. Also love the envelopes. The Octatrack has a steep learning curve at the very start, but is the fastest and easiest to use once you get over that hump. The versatility of the Octatrack just can’t be beat.
Get better!
You too!
Haha! True, Digitakt isn’t stereo. It’s billed as a drum sampler, but it’s a crazy good machine and things can get ‘stereoized’ after the fact. Seriously, it’s awesome. That said, I have so many loops and one shots from various failed experiment or unfinished songs (same thing), it could be fun and easy to load those into a simple machine and put the pieces together. I’d have to look at the Samples more seriously since I never really thought about that sort of thing after getting an Octatrack. :Samples and :Cycles are both on sale at the moment too, so I get the temptation. Polyend Tracker and 1010 BlackBox are also serious contenders. The tracker style sequencing in the Polyend is very different and could be great fun, but I don’t know yet. Was hoping a new amazing sequencer would be announced at Superbooth, but nothing so far. If I could get an Oxi One, I’d try it. Can’t seem to pull the trigger on the Squarp Pyramid for some reasonDigitakt doesn't do stereo sampling.
(Like from vinyl or other similar sources)
Octatrack...one day...one day.....
I'll make just as bad music on stuff way more expensive.
![]()
Stereoized??!Haha! True, Digitakt isn’t stereo. It’s billed as a drum sampler, but it’s a crazy good machine and things can get ‘stereoized’ after the fact. Seriously, it’s awesome. That said, I have so many loops and one shots from various failed experiment or unfinished songs (same thing), it could be fun and easy to load those into a simple machine and put the pieces together. I’d have to look at the Samples more seriously since I never really thought about that sort of thing after getting an Octatrack. :Samples and :Cycles are both on sale at the moment too, so I get the temptation. Polyend Tracker and 1010 BlackBox are also serious contenders. The tracker style sequencing in the Polyend is very different and could be great fun, but I don’t know yet. Was hoping a new amazing sequencer would be announced at Superbooth, but nothing so far. If I could get an Oxi One, I’d try it. Can’t seem to pull the trigger on the Squarp Pyramid for some reason
Stereoized??!
Help me out here.
![]()
DT can do the "track mute states per pattern" thing. Thats totally crucial for me !
totally agree on the cycles plus samples.
and anyway on the digitakt.
I never had the :samples. With no direct sample load its not for me.
But i see its appeal otherwise. anyway for how low you can have them, even here.
And i have in fact two DTs. One is my main sequenzer for my modular.
A DT anyday over the :samples, finally.
DT can do the "track mute states per pattern" thing. Thats totally crucial for me !
OT does NOT ! .....another reason i could not go back to the OT when i had a MKII for a few years lieing around. Sold it finally this year. hard decission. My heart is with the OT.
i just recognised the other day that the cycles is also not doing that "track mutestates per pattern" thing. bummer. I kind of overlooked that bevore.
Or, i switched a setting somewhere and can´t find it again. lol
@dukeorock
Have you looked at the WMD Metron as an option, instead of the Erica Black?
Link Removed
I just watched a demo and kinda liked what I saw. It is more expensive, and still a lot of hp.
Edit - Dang. Just noticed the Voltera add-on, or some similar device is needed for melodic stuff.
tracks can be muted or be active.Maybe it’s a language thing but I’m not sure what this is or how you use it. Then again I don’t have a DT.
any place we can hear this huge set up?tracks can be muted or be active.
in the DT is that "mute state" of each track, part of whats saved within each pattern.
The track volume as such on top of that also.
in the octatrack is that coupled to the "Parts". But you have only 4 "parts" per 16 patterns. If you chnage any such setting, is it chnaged in any pattren that sues that same "part".
( thats the main confusing bit with the OT, at least for beginners / and takes you quite a bit of freedom away)
For some styles is a global "mutestate of the tracks" desireable.
But for more creative or experimental music would you lose alots of arrangement flexibility.
while i personally never would use such think like the arranger in the OT, which delivers the mutestate per track functionality, finally.
tracks can be muted or be active.
in the DT is that "mute state" of each track, part of whats saved within each pattern.
The track volume as such on top of that also.
in the octatrack is that coupled to the "Parts". But you have only 4 "parts" per 16 patterns. If you chnage any such setting, is it chnaged in any pattren that sues that same "part".
( thats the main confusing bit with the OT, at least for beginners / and takes you quite a bit of freedom away)
For some styles is a global "mutestate of the tracks" desireable.
But for more creative or experimental music would you lose alots of arrangement flexibility.
while i personally never would use such think like the arranger in the OT, which delivers the mutestate per track functionality, finally.