My point was how I find it interesting that this case has received so much media attention and others as heinous don't even get mentioned.
Got any examples to back up this assertion?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My point was how I find it interesting that this case has received so much media attention and others as heinous don't even get mentioned.
In general, I find that "Why isn't this other thing getting attention?" posters overstate the similarities of the case(s) they have in mind and understate the amount of media attention those case(s) are getting. For example, I assume you didn't hear about these other heinous cases by carrier pigeon, so you probably read about them when they actually were mentioned somewhere.My point was how I find it interesting that this case has received so much media attention and others as heinous don't even get mentioned.
Can you explain why that might be?
I have faith in humanity in one simple truth. Most of the ignorance and bigotry will die with the older generations.
I don't see mentioning the amount of media attention this case is getting as a derail at all.rather than always trying to derail.
Got any examples to back up this assertion?
My point was how I find it interesting that this case has received so much media attention and others as heinous don't even get mentioned.
Can you explain why that might be?
from what I read, there were a rash of recent break-ins in the neighborhood.Isn't the kind of stereotyping that went on in this case worthy of attention, since it seems to have led in a very short span of time to someone's death?
Got any examples to back up this assertion?
Being suspicious of a stranger is stereotyping? I consider it being prudent. especially for a "neighborhood watch" guy on patrol.
It was dark, raining and the 17 year old had a hood covering his head.
Did the shooter confirm that he knew the kid was black before he confronted him?
would it even matter?
He killed him just because he was black?Maybe you should actually do a little of your own research before spouting off.. Maybe.. Oh and YES IT IS, YES HE DID, IT OBVIOUSLY DID MATTER AS HE KILLED HIM...
PS.. still waiting on your cases that are just as heinous but haven't received media attention..
from what I read, there were a rash of recent break-ins in the neighborhood.
Being suspicious of a stranger is stereotyping? I consider it being prudent. especially for a "neighborhood watch" guy on patrol.
It was dark, raining and the 17 year old had a hood covering his head.
Did the shooter confirm that he knew the kid was black before he confronted him?
would it even matter?
He killed him just because he was black?
I hadn't heard that.
Posting other cased would be a derail, and that it not my intention.
..........
Race seems to always be brought to the forefront when the victim is black, ever notice that?........
ABC New reported that the neighborhood watch program that Zimmerman supposedly volunteered for was not registered. The Martin family lawyer noted that Trayvon Martin's body was tested for drugs while Zimmerman was not given a drug test of any kind.
As I said before, we cannont prove a negative, but to me it really looks like Sanford did not seriously investigate this killing, and the hold your ground law has been used as a smoke screen to justify doing nothing.
I think the convenening of the Seminole County grand jury is too little too late to cover their negligence.
Posting other cased would be a derail, and that it not my intention.