I haven't played either and so have nothing to base this on, but it appears that the eq of the bx1500 is very, very different than the b2000.
The bx1500's three bands of semi-para eq combined with the graphic section really leaves only the shelving bass and treble controls that have any chance of being similarly voiced. If it has any of that similar gank, it should be very easy to eq it right out.
As always, I could be wrong, ymmv, etc.
That makes sense...

For the tone I like it does require EQing. Keep in mind I have a very specific tone. I dont like high mids and cut there quite a bit. I dont have much in the way of highs in my tone, but I boost the upper bass / low-mids to get a full yet punchy tone.
I'm not very good at describing tone, but I'd say set FLAT this amp does have a fair bit upper mid content. I dont know that I would call it "gank" but it dials out easily enough IME. I cant comment on the 'overlap between the treble frequencies and the upper mids' issue as I generally kibosh those frequencies and cant quite remember how those sound flat since I never play the amp that way.
Again, *I* think the amp does require eq for *my* tone. BUT with the semi-parametric eq it is fairly easy to achieve a very nice warm tone.
Thanks for your thoughts. Seems that even if the two amps should have a very similar basic voicing, the extensive EQ capabilities of the BX1500 would make all the difference.
I'd expect the basic voicing of the B2000 to be noticeably better in order to justify the difference in power and the difference in price...

MM
