The shortest stretch I can think of is that if they played the same covers one band could claim the other is using their name to get crowds etc and all the unpleasantness that could result from that.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You said they are a cover band. I can't see how it's even possible that you are ripping them off. They don't write anything.

I'm really unsure now... it's only because we are so close geographically that I think a name change is necessary. Well, I don't actually think it is, but they want me to. I'm not really sure where I'm standing with this right now. Are there different rights or something for Cover bands and Original bands? I just don't want to get myself into trouble later down the line... oh dear, I am confused![]()
Dudelbug. With an umlaut over the u.
Since you are a solo act it would fit just fine without losing what brand recognition you already have.
agreedI'm sorry, but I have to say it:
"Doodlebug" isn't a very good band name.
I'm sorry, but I have to say it:
"Doodlebug" isn't a very good band name.
Yup. I don't want to be mean but personally it would put me off completely.
Cover bands should have silly names and originals should be slightly more serious....erm unless you play in an original ska band maybe.
Doodlebomb
Oh, I though you were changing your name to "How Little Is Acceptable?"
I thought, wow, those guys are secure in their manhood.
or maybe go for the Prince approach.
and call it
"The artist formerly known as Doodlebug."
It seems silly at first but then you realise the dark connotations with it...![]()