• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

CITES - What every bass player should know

What's wrong with maple? (kidding). I live in a tropical country, and laws protecting rare woods are getting harder day by day here. There is a reason, and it's a good thing that customs all over the world are making an effort. These trees are living habitats for monkeys, sloths, insects, birds, small mammals which are food for larger predators. They provide soil humidity, dead leaves to rot there and make food for mushrooms, which are food for other animals etc. For short, a lot of problems arise when forests are cut down, these ecosystems rely on a variety of species of trees living close to each other, including rare hardwoods, fruit trees, etc. But... There are "tree farms" which produce a variety of woods for industry, we just have to choose builders that use hardwoods that come from sustainable sources.
 
The real test of this whole thing will be how hard the permitting is and how the documentation is honored in light of the obviously flawed documentation system.

I can't think of a single logical argument for confiscating instruments from musicians that are played by the musician as contraband. That is the definition of stupidity and abuse of power. Hopefully, that is extremely infrequent. Regulation of commercial builders is a whole different situation. IMO

That is the definition of government agents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StayLow
I'm glad that something is being done -- with due respect to those reading, forests are infinitely more important than new basses. And I think that if people really had the opportunity to see how much damage is being done, they'd agree.

So, we get down to 'how?'

The idea of someone having their bass seized and chopped up is, IMO, fear-mongering. Are there instances of this happening as a regular practice? I know of none, and used to be very familiar with "tourist visa tours."

There will always be corruption in law enforcement. The problem there is corruption - not the law, nor the idea behind it. We do not try to stamp out corruption by eliminating good laws. Otherwise, we are simply saying that laws exist for our personal convenience.

When I think about the number of Starcasters / Bullets / entry level instruments occupying landfills, it's jarring.

The planet is indeed in need of rescuing, right now, and every little bit matters.
 
I'm glad that something is being done -- with due respect to those reading, forests are infinitely more important than new basses. And I think that if people really had the opportunity to see how much damage is being done, they'd agree.

So, we get down to 'how?'

The idea of someone having their bass seized and chopped up is, IMO, fear-mongering. Are there instances of this happening as a regular practice? I know of none, and used to be very familiar with "tourist visa tours."

There will always be corruption in law enforcement. The problem there is corruption - not the law, nor the idea behind it. We do not try to stamp out corruption by eliminating good laws. Otherwise, we are simply saying that laws exist for our personal convenience.

When I think about the number of Starcasters / Bullets / entry level instruments occupying landfills, it's jarring.

The planet is indeed in need of rescuing, right now, and every little bit matters.

"jarring"???
Do you have a figure in tonnes?

Do you know how much timber went up in smoke in Tennessee this past week?
To me, THAT is jarring!
 
  • Like
Reactions: savofenno
This thread is being permitted because it directly deals with basses and how traveling/shipping them is affected by these rulings. The further real political and/or psychotic conspiracy theory aspects aren't what this thread is for. If you absolutely cannot contain your political feelings on the matter, or feel you must scream them to the world or the illuminati might come to steal our protective tin foil hats, please feel free to address these concerns to your nearest brick wall, because they ain't gonna fly here. More than enough warnings have been given- it would be a shame to shut down a useful thread because some people can't control themselves, but it's what will happen if this continues.
Just gonna quote the moderator's post on the previous page for emphasis. As it makes obvious, this thread is not supposed to be a place to debate gubmint regulation.
 
Black ebony is NOT illegal. What may be illegal, however, is the sourcing. IF it was from Madagascar, and IF it was not harvested legally (which is another whole definition issue in a country with warlords cutting down forests...), then there could be problems like Gibson ran into a couple of years ago. Ebony is not listed on CITES II, and so it's not a problem for CITES reasons.
 
Also, I've seen a ratio of about 19 to 1 of posts where the person posting has any real idea of what's going on with these new rosewood regulations. Here is where you should start: Podcast 127: CITES Rosewood Updates with John Thomas | Fretboard Journal followed by this: Have Guitar Passport, Will Travel | Fretboard Journal

Your opinions of what the regulations are or should be are totally irrelevant. This is a done deal, and as such it will not be easily overturned or modified. You either get with the program in the real world...and, yes, I agree it's ugly...or you risk having one or more instruments confiscated. These regulations will be horribly unevenly enforced. There will be little or no logic. Fighting will go against you; these are entitled bureaucrats you'll be dealing with. They're getting paid to hassle you; you're losing time (which equals money) trying to argue with them. They'll hang onto your instrument and tell you to appeal any decisions. This is Napoleonic law. You are guilty until proven innocent. Pay no attention to most of what you read from musicians here and elsewhere on the Internet. Learn what the regulations really are; don't put your own spin on them. The two articles/video I linked to above are from the guy who is the expert on this stuff, John Thomas. He's a vintage guitar nut, a damned good player, a writer, and he's a lawyer. Follow what he says. Also know that this is all just now shaking out.
 
...the restrictions do not affect individuals traveling with personal instruments between countries and no documentation is required for that (with the exception of Brazilian Rosewood).
Try and tell that to the agent who just confiscated your instrument. They don't know about all the various specific species of rosewooods, nor would they care to make any distinction. Unfortunately, for those who travel.
 
To me this is an example of ineffective government regulation. How incredibly expensive it is to test wood for species, to tell if it is cocobolo or some other wood that looks like it. I can see doing it for manufacturers of products, but for an average Joe crossing the border to earn a living??
Black ebony is NOT illegal. What may be illegal, however, is the sourcing. IF it was from Madagascar, and IF it was not harvested legally (which is another whole definition issue in a country with warlords cutting down forests...), then there could be problems...
it seems from some reading that only newer instruments are effected by this. my 69 is pre-CITES rosewood regulations so I think I might be ok. Although, I might need to get that certification if I do travel abroad.

The problem with the regulation isn't the regulation itself, it's compliance and enforcement. I don't have a problem with regulations, I have a problem with onerous burdens imposed by regulations. For musicians, this could easily be handled by having a standardized form, accepted by all relevant government agencies, that declare what woods (+ sourcing) are used in an instrument. Such a form would accompany every new instrument sold (even if the wood is ubiquitous as maple or alder) and would serve as the instrument's passport. Once manufacturers get in the habit of providing that information with instruments on a form that is universally accepted by government agencies, compliance with regulations will be a non-issue for musicians crossing borders.