This thread is absolutely killin' me.
Survey: How many of you are completely happy with the poly finish vs. the nitro ? Do you have second thoughts or regrets getting poly?
The nitro apparently has more true-tone as the wood dries and the finish shrinks/cracks/chips. I don't know if my ear would be good enough to tell and difference. So basically it's True Tone over your interpretation of aesthetics. Some love the new look while other like the vintage look as the nitro ages and does it's thing.
I've already pm'd a few of you about this so feel free to comment or not. I also talked with Jimmy a bit yesterday for the first time. Awesome Guy for sure.
My interest is a 4 string standard jazz.
Rosewood board w/dots.
Alder body.
(not sure about finish color or type)
Tort P/G
AC pickups
AC 2-band
AC passive tc
Chrome hardware
vol/vol/ptc/eq/eq no plate
I would like the Hipshot B bridge, but Jimmy dosen't offer it in a 4 string. I'd have to go with a bent plate or Badass type.
Anyway, I'm just thinking about it and want to learn more first.
TIA
No regrets on my poly. Per our PM, I would personally never own a nitro finished bass (been there and done that with an FBass
). I am one who believes there is no impact on sound, and I could never deal with the dings and chips myself.That being said, if I wanted to aesthetically go for a very vintage looking instrument, that nitro 3T burst is about as 'classic' and accurate as I've seen, and that sort of finish dinged up a bit actually looks OK to me, since we are so used to seeing the old Fenders all chipped up, etc.
I absolutely love the finish on the A-C though... hard and durable, and the 'metal flake' sort of thing going on in the paint is very cool looking to me.
Pure IMO!
PS Bent plate bridge all the way with that more vintage spec IMO!
) soundwise.