TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Guys, what's Cliff's neck profile like? Shallow C, D, maybe standard C or deeper... a bit rounder?
I'm about 2-3hrs from there, but I'd make a trip for that. PM me your address and we'll see if we can work out a time maybe on a Saturday soon. I've already got a top reserved.If you are in the chicago area anytime soon hit me up. You can come by and check out my fretted and fretless 5's
I'm about 2-3hrs from there, but I'd make a trip for that. PM me your address and we'll see if we can work out a time maybe on a Saturday soon. I've already got a top reserved.![]()
You know, I'm considering the modern with purpleheart too, but I'm still generally leaning towards his standard neck. I'm still pestering him with questions. It would be a lot easier if I'd played a few of these at some point in the past.Very nice.
Cliff and I are about done with the specs for my fretless 7. There's a medium scale bass with a maple neck in the january build and I'm very interested in the results. However, I'll most likely get a,"Modern" neck with a wider strip of wenge.
Ash body?
I'm not familiar with walnut as a body wood, but mahogany is gonna' be a bit bigger/warmer down low and in the low mids, a bit less aggressive in the upper mids and highs. On another bass I've had, mahogany (actually, in my case it was sapele) didn't work out so well. I found I really prefer ash and alder for the most part so I could have a bit more going on a bit higher. Just felt like I was getting a bit too much compression up high with that body wood.Ash is definitely in the running. I'm partial to walnut, too. And I've been curious about mahogany.
I have a Peavey Cirrus with a walnut body and neck, but it has a bit of a compressed sound. It can be somewhat heavy depending on the density (which can vary) and body shape.
Mahogany tends to be a little warmer sounding. There's some form of african "mahogany" that's pretty light. I have a Stambaugh made of that type of mahogany, but the EMG P/J pickups speak very loudly in the overall tonal equation.
My CB six string had a walnut body, and it was pretty heavy. It sounded really great because of it though.
-ScottM
No doubt that walnut can sound good, although I think Elrick's use of walnut tone blocks tends to get the tonal benefit of walnut without weighing the bass down too much.
My last CB had a walnut core and was still the lightest bass I've ever owned. Probably because the Ball shape is pretty compact. Right now, I'm thinking maybe butternut with a walnut back. They're pretty much the same as far as tone is concerned (or so I've heard), but I like the idea of the color variation with the walnut back.
Ash is definitely in the running. I'm partial to walnut, too. And I've been curious about mahogany.
Here's another question: Does anybody out there have a decent photo of the back of Rami-style CB? I've searched TB and the CB site, but I haven't come up with much. If someone could post one, I'd appreciate it...