Circumstances have saved me from myself. I was within a few hours of trading away my Metro PJ5 for a Lakland 55-94.
I think I would love to have another Lakland, and if the right one comes along, I might reconsider a deal. But, there are so many positives about Sadowsky that I am not sure that I would as pleased with something else.
I do like the PJ, but there are some issues that I don't really know how to address. My thoughts are this:
My Modern is SO much more enjoyable to play. I think some of it has to do with the weight, but more so, I think it is the neck profile. Once you acclimate to the modern neck, the PJ is very chunky by comparison. I very much prefer the feel of the Modern.
The modern has so much more going on for me tonally. I realize that it is a unique animal. But, the PJ tone is almost lacking that "third dimension" compared to the Modern. I find myself constantly trying to milk more out of the PJ.
So, I am absolutely content to settle with the fact that the Sadowsky Modern is really the best bass for me. I bought, sold or traded probably 20-25 basses over an 8-9 year period and during that time, my Modulus Q5 was ever once even considered to be available for any kind of deal. In my mind, it was simply off limits. My NYC easily found that same place in my head. It just seemed right from the beginning.
But, I do have somewhat of a "need" for a backup/alternate bass. The PJ5 makes some sense, but the fact is that comparatively, I have absolutely no desire to play it. And after this bass and two NYC Vintage style Sadowsky basses, I think I may have no desire to play those sorts at all!!
I'd love to have thoughts what would make for a nice "alternate" that would give me a somewhat different tone profile, but not stray too far away from the the feel of the modern. Some thoughts include:
I think I would love to have another Lakland, and if the right one comes along, I might reconsider a deal. But, there are so many positives about Sadowsky that I am not sure that I would as pleased with something else.
I do like the PJ, but there are some issues that I don't really know how to address. My thoughts are this:
My Modern is SO much more enjoyable to play. I think some of it has to do with the weight, but more so, I think it is the neck profile. Once you acclimate to the modern neck, the PJ is very chunky by comparison. I very much prefer the feel of the Modern.
The modern has so much more going on for me tonally. I realize that it is a unique animal. But, the PJ tone is almost lacking that "third dimension" compared to the Modern. I find myself constantly trying to milk more out of the PJ.
So, I am absolutely content to settle with the fact that the Sadowsky Modern is really the best bass for me. I bought, sold or traded probably 20-25 basses over an 8-9 year period and during that time, my Modulus Q5 was ever once even considered to be available for any kind of deal. In my mind, it was simply off limits. My NYC easily found that same place in my head. It just seemed right from the beginning.
But, I do have somewhat of a "need" for a backup/alternate bass. The PJ5 makes some sense, but the fact is that comparatively, I have absolutely no desire to play it. And after this bass and two NYC Vintage style Sadowsky basses, I think I may have no desire to play those sorts at all!!
I'd love to have thoughts what would make for a nice "alternate" that would give me a somewhat different tone profile, but not stray too far away from the the feel of the modern. Some thoughts include:
- A Metro M24-5 or another NYC Modern 24-5 and swap out the PUs for Big Singles.
- A MV24-5. These intrigue me but I think Vic may have the only one in existence. (Vic, is yours an NYC or Metro?) I assume the neck feel is more like the Modern 24-5.
- Custom another Modern 24-5 with a completely different PU config. This is probably best, but obviously the most expensive!!


