• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Confessions of a Flatwound convert...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Represent!!

After trying Sunbeams on my Bongo 5 for about a month, I still felt they were too clacky and zingy, especially on the D and G. So i tool the plunge and got a set of Chromes. All I can say is - heavenly! Gut busting punch without end, just enough sustain, and no damn clack. And the Bongo's tonal flexibility le's me dial in just enough mids and highs to cover round-ish rock sounds. :cool:
 
I don't know, Sundogue, now that I've got the SVT back, I'm starting to miss rounds. It felt like the flats went too far in the other direction tonight and I wasn't getting any attack at all. I don't want to give up on flats entirely, but I also don't want to cart two basses to every gig. I have enough problems doubling on upright without a second electric complicating things. So I might be bailing on you. For now, I'll just be the roundwound devil on your shoulder. :cool:

Hey...as I've mentioned many times...I LOVE ROUNDS (Shhh, don't tell anyone else :ninja:). But it depends on the context they are used in.

Besides, you play upright :cool:, so you are forgiven. :D
 
Represent!!

After trying Sunbeams on my Bongo 5 for about a month, I still felt they were too clacky and zingy, especially on the D and G. So i tool the plunge and got a set of Chromes. All I can say is - heavenly! Gut busting punch without end, just enough sustain, and no damn clack. And the Bongo's tonal flexibility le's me dial in just enough mids and highs to cover round-ish rock sounds. :cool:

Yeah, I have Chromes on an active 5 string Washburn. I can cop the P-Bass fairly well (and before P-Bass lovers get on me about it...I do have a P-Bass too and it is, by far, my favorite bass...but I need a 5 string for all the down-tunings and other songs we do that I use it for).

With it being active, and using the Chromes I can dial in some of that harsh, bright tone and then if I really dig in with a pick, it's pretty 'roundish' sounding, but still maintains that deep flat sound too.
 
I recently decided to revisit flat wounds on my Warwick Streamer 5 string. I got a set of Labella's and put them on.
I played them and found that I didn't like the 2 low strings.
The E and B strings sounded, for lack of a better word, unfocused. The other strings though, sounded great.
I now have a hybrid. I restrung my low B, E and A with
the old DR Roundwounds and left the flatwounds on the
D and G. The flats have more volume than the rounds on the higher strings. They seem to be pretty well balanced now.
Has anybody else tried this ? Did I do something wrong initially and maybe I should give all 5 flatwounds another try ?
 
Well Dogue, we've agreed so far. But gotta disagree there.

Nothing wrong with someone playing bass by themself, for themself.

It's wrong for me, & perhaps for you, but it's right for them.

My point was that it was a pointless discussion in this thread.

But really when it comes down to it, if one is only playing alone who cares what bass that person is playing, what strings are on it, what gear it's plugged into, if no one is going to hear it? And if you say it matters to the person playing alone...well, good for him/her. If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, should it be strung with rounds or flats? Who gives a sh*t?
 
I recently decided to revisit flat wounds on my Warwick Streamer 5 string. I got a set of Labella's and put them on.
I played them and found that I didn't like the 2 low strings.
The E and B strings sounded, for lack of a better word, unfocused. The other strings though, sounded great.
I now have a hybrid. I restrung my low B, E and A with
the old DR Roundwounds and left the flatwounds on the
D and G. The flats have more volume than the rounds on the higher strings. They seem to be pretty well balanced now.
Has anybody else tried this ? Did I do something wrong initially and maybe I should give all 5 flatwounds another try ?

I have done that very thing! It really works for me when I've used rounds as the D and G strings of most sets are typically far too weak in comparison to the other strings. Go for it!

I have to say though the the low B on these Chromes is the best Low B I've ever played and if I ever went back to rounds the low B Chrome will stay on!
 
I have a Smith Burner 4-string with a non-functioning preamp. When I play it in passive mode it tends to sound very nasally and sort of "pointy" from the middle of the neck on up. I have not had the ability to hear it with the active pre on, as it's never worked since I got the bass. I'll be sending it to Ken Smith at some point-when I can afford it- to get a rebuilt pre installed.

Until then I've ordered a set of Chromes (.40-100) to see if I can get rid of the nasty pointy midrange. I will post with results (the bass now has rounds of some kind on it).
 
Report from the studio (kinda long, but I tried to include plenty of details to give a clear picture of what was going on)-

I hit the studio to record last night. It was the first session since changing to the La Bella Deep Talkin' flats. I rolled in with the Corvette $$ 4 string plugged into a Mesa M6 Carbine head (gain at about 10pm, bass at noon w/ boost pulled, mids at noon, mid selector in the 2nd position which cuts a bit of mids, highs rolled back to 9pm, master at noon). I ran it into my single 15 PH cab. I started using the neck pickup in single coil mode with the highs rolled off on the onboard pre-amp and the bass boosted.

As soon as I started to warm up, our guitarist/engineer commented on how lovely my tone was. It was nice and warm and woody; percussive and fat, but not boomy. It sounded great for the track we were working on first, a slightly new-wave post-punk-ish rock track. The next track we cut was meant to be a bit more snotty and grindy. I found the tone to be too smooth. It sounded lovely, but lacked the guts I wanted to hear. I flipped the many switches on the $$ and adjusted the levels a bit and found myself in the bridge pickup using the serries setting, with most of my other EQ settings in tact. Bang - instant snarl and guts. We then jumped to a third track that was closer to a Depeche-ish vibe. I jumped back to the neck pickup and found a great place to fit in with the synth-keys, where my tone almost mimicked and hid behind the lower notes of the keys when I was in the 7th fret E on the A string (it is a key-focused song, so this was good), but the higher register notes on the bass stood out just enough when I did some arpeggio runs in the bridge, and I had a great percussive punch for some staccato sections where I was on the open-5th postions on the E. The arrangement called for some slides between notes, which the flats sounded wonderful for (wish my timing was better on them though). Also, for reference track one and two had me on a flat pick and track three had me using fingers.

Before, I had recorded with my Epi T-bird (neck PU) and run through a 212 cab and used the bridge pickup. Live, I had been using the Epi (bridge PU) and the 212 with the mids boosted and rounds. The Epi w/ rounds sounded good, but the $$ with the flats sounded great and had some versatility. I had tried running the $$ in an earlier recording session, but it didn't sound very good. At that time I was using the stock Warwick rounds that came on it and I hadn't found some of the sweet spots in the EQ settings.

I mentioned that I had switched to flats to the guitarist/engineer and he wanted a run at my bass, so I handed it over. He was impressed, as he had never played flats before.

I'm not saying the flats were everything, but they did help quite a bit.
 
OK, Sundogue. From the info I received in this thread, and with my communication with others on TB, I'm going to try some flats.

I ordered a set of TI Jazz Flats, and they should be here in a day or so. I chose the TI Flats due to the responses I read about the sound, longevity, and quality. The only thing that was really concerning me was the MAJOR tension issue I keep hearing (reading) about. But, I have a 35" 5-string bass with 5 individual single saddle bridges, place in a "fanned" type manner which allows greater scale length for each string heavier than the G-string. So the B-string should be closer to 36” scale.

This set-up should increase the tension of the strings to a more acceptable level. Although, the actual string set is much lighter than I am use to. I do, however, play with a lighter touch than most.

I'll let you know how they work out.
 
For me it really dpends on the sound, I love both. For rounds I keep the tone rolled most of the way off for the most part to savor those lows but still have the grind you get from rounds, versus flats which always have their inherent 'thump' to them. I LOVE the feel of flats, beautiful to play, but the tone isnt always for everything. It was however, a GLORIOUS day when I put together flats + P-bass + pick, such a beautiful old-school feeling tone. Chromes were fun but kinda different, been really digging the Rotosounds, next up are GHS precision flats.

Strings are what you make of them!
 
I've ruffled a few feathers with my statements about flats, and with some I've just flat out pissed them off.

Those that keep saying rounds can do what flats do, I agree...to some degree. But there is a difference between the two types of strings, each having their own character that the other can't do as well.

DISCLAIMER: I play rounds and I know what they do, how they sound and how to use them. Some roundwound players like to play flats too, so a lot of my comments are not directed at those who already understand and appreciate what flats offer.

What I find humorous is that exclusively roundwound players think all they need to do is cut the highs, palm mute the strings, bump up the low mids or lows, maybe add a bit more compression, etc. (I had to add the "etc" for those round players who will no doubt want to add their favorite "flat tone copping" technique I've missed, so therefore think I don't get how they do it) and end up with a Flat sound. They think of flats as "old school" thump and not much more. They certainly don't think flats are useful for anything other than a few songs at best.

What most roundwound players hate about flats is the very thing flats excel at doing...and it's what most players hate doing...blend into the rhythm section more. I said MORE, as in more than what rounds can do...not that rounds can't do it at all.

For all their talk about being tight with the drummer, sitting down in the mix, or creating their own sonic space that they can accomplish just as easily with rounds (it's all technique...everything is all about technique, isn't it? I mean that's why we all play washtub basses with one string...cause it's all technique...heaven forbid any of us would admit that we actually want or need certain kinds of gear to sound the way we do) they are also the same people who want to cut through the mix and be heard just as clear as the guitards. What I need is to NOT cut through the mix, but rather sit down lower in it, in my own space where the guitards can't go...just above the drums but also locked in with them soundwise. Almost like giving the drums a note, where the drums provide the beat, but the bass makes those drumbeats play a musical note. It's all about sonic space for me. Roundwounds have a quality that makes them sound more guitar-like. But that is precisely what flats do for me...make my bass sound more like a bass and less like a guitar, which is not a very popular, 'modern' sentiment about bass.

The whole problem with rounds is that they make a bass sound like a lower tuned guitar and then bass players fight this "guitar sound" trying to not get lost with the guitars...and thus seeking all this gear to get themselves to cut through and be heard again. If you want your bass to sound like a lower tuned guitar, don't then complain that it gets lost in the mix with other guitars. What would you expect to happen? Not all roundwound players get lost in the mix, but given the thousands of posts over the years about that very problem, it's no surprise to me why it happens.

The whole point of this thread...my sole reason for posting it was my personal discovery of what flats do for me that for 30 years I kept trying NOT to do. Have my bass sound like a bass and sit down in the mix as part of the low end, part of the rhythm section and NOT be a part of guitard world.

It's the very thing roundwound players hate about flats (I did too) that I found I needed! Now many roundwound players will tell me that, heck if all they wanted to do was get "lost in the mix" (another of my favorites), they can just as easily muddy up their sound to sound like flats. :rollno: They just do not get it. They mistake a bass sounding more like a bass and less like a guitar as just being "lost in the mix" and not "cutting through enough".

This discovery I made, about me playing in my band has nothing whatsoever to do with "cutting through the mix". It has everything to do with pulling back out of guitard world and getting back to the rhythm section where I (not you...me) belong with the drummer. A place where the bass does rule (with authority) mostly because no other instrument sounds like it. I have no need to "cut through". I'm always present in the mix, because no matter what the guitards do, the bass is always clearly heard...as a bass. Flats do that better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N. Kentucky Bass
I used to be one of those round's only players. But for some reason, mostly ignorance on my part I guess, it seemed that there was just some sort of negative stigma with having flatwounds on the bass. Like it made you less of a player or something. Everytime I heard the word "flats" I just kind of cringed.

But, once I started reading through here and hearing people talk about them and then actually hearing players that use them on recordings and what not I went and put some Chromes on my fretless. I fell in love with the sound. It was just beautiful. I then wanted to explore the different sonicalities(is that a word) of tapewounds and black beauties etc...on my Fender Jazz Bass Special and my Kubicki Factor. Well, I couldn't find any the day I wanted to do it and didn't want to wait so I took them off the fretless and put them on the Fender. WOW!!!!

I got 2 sets yesterday and put the old ones back on the fretless and strung up the Fender and Kubicki with new sets of Chromes and holy crap, the Kubicki sound with them is just succulent!!! Crunchy highs and sweet lows.

Now don't get me wrong here, I still love the crunch with the rounds on it...but there's just something different with the Chromes.

I hope others that also have that same stigma I did about flats will see past that and give them a try.
It took me 25 years of playing rounds before I did it and I wish I had done it 15 years ago.

:bassist:
 
I used to be one of those round's only players. But for some reason, mostly ignorance on my part I guess, it seemed that there was just some sort of negative stigma with having flatwounds on the bass. Like it made you less of a player or something. Everytime I heard the word "flats" I just kind of cringed.

But, once I started reading through here and hearing people talk about them and then actually hearing players that use them on recordings and what not I went and put some Chromes on my fretless. I fell in love with the sound. It was just beautiful. I then wanted to explore the different sonicalities(is that a word) of tapewounds and black beauties etc...on my Fender Jazz Bass Special and my Kubicki Factor. Well, I couldn't find any the day I wanted to do it and didn't want to wait so I took them off the fretless and put them on the Fender. WOW!!!!

I got 2 sets yesterday and put the old ones back on the fretless and strung up the Fender and Kubicki with new sets of Chromes and holy crap, the Kubicki sound with them is just succulent!!! Crunchy highs and sweet lows.

Now don't get me wrong here, I still love the crunch with the rounds on it...but there's just something different with the Chromes.

I hope others that also have that same stigma I did about flats will see past that and give them a try.
It took me 25 years of playing rounds before I did it and I wish I had done it 15 years ago.

:bassist:

Exactly. THAT stigma about flats. And that stigma isn't even deserved. Flats today (like Chromes for instance) don't sound at all like 40 year old, dull rubber bands. And I think that's what some roundwound players think all flats are like.

I'm thrilled I rediscovered flats. It's better late than never!
 
Interesting thread. I use both roundwounds and flatwounds depending upon on what I am playing. I have found in my experience that either can get me the sound I am looking for , but if I had to choose only one the roundwounds would win everytime. I have had trouble playing some bigger halls using flatwounds,the sound was boomy and I lost note definition. I have found with roundwounds it's much more easy to walk in and dial up my sound. I love to use flatwounds when recording or playing in smaller bands. If I am playing Jazz,old R&B or old Country, I love the flatwound sound (yes, I do know the differnce in the sound between the two strings). This has been my experience and I don't intend to offend any flatwound users, although regardless of how we feel about our guitar playing brothers I do not find it necessary to call them "guitards". Thank you,Steve

I don't find it necessary to call them that either. It's just fun. :D

I switched to flats because I play in a loud band and they are less boomy with more definition than rounds.

To each his own.
 
I've found in my experience flatwounds to sound more boomy ,but you seem to be the expert on strings.

Well, I'm sure a lot of factors come into play...bass, amp, cab, settings, PA, etc.

I tend to not have much problems with being boomy with either rounds or flats...but flats settle it down more for me.

I'm no string expert, though I play one on TB. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.