TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Jeff and tuBass, I wish you both well, and a good night. Peace, brothers!
jeffbrown said:At least where I am, the police are trained in what to look for vis a vis drunk/impaired drivers. Making a stop on a whim doesn't cut it in court - the officer will have the case dismissed by any good defense lawyer. (See previous content about good cops/bad cops//good stops/bad stops//probable cause.) I cannot vouch for other locales. Have I heard the stories? Yep, right here. And if anyone here feels aggrieved by perceived bias, there are certainly legal actions one may take.
Just make sure you have your ducks in a row, 'cause the last thing a judge wants/needs to hear is another frivolous lawsuit in district court.

You hang out at place where people get drunk and then leave to drive drunk. ... guilt by association.
It wasn't a strange or racial observation..It wouldn't have been my lack of pigment that made me a target,it would be the value of an entire band's worth of equipment pre-loaded in a brand new $40K truck in an area where you can buy a 4 bedroom house for less than $20K. And he's absolutely correct that I stood out like a sore thumb..I'm sure some of our Detroit brethren would agree that Cass Corridor at 3am is a great place to be from...far,far away from"He also said that being seen loading thousands in gear made me a great car-jack target for the next stop light". I am white, and I find this is a strange thing for the cop to say I think any race of people would be a target in that situation!
Ok, lets talk about the real innocent here. According to the CVC, nearly 11,000 innocent men, women and children were killed by drunk drivers in 2009 in the USA. To put that into perspective, that is equal to one large U.S. commercial jetliner with over 200 passengers on board crashing every single week, week in and week out, and killing everyone onboard. I am a pilot and if the risk of getting onboard an aircraft was that high, I would not fly. If a cop pulls me over at 2:00 am to check me out I do not think of myself as being the victim. He is just playing to odds. He is trying to keep me and others from becoming a real victim and another drunk driving fatality statistic. What wrong with saving lives?
this post brings to mind a quote from Benjamin Franklin, originally published in the Poor Richard's Almanac
"Those who would trade essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety, and will soon lose both"
If airplanes were falling out of the sky, I am sure the public we demand that the authorites do something about it. It is the same with drunk drivers. What about the civil liberty of the thousands of people killed each year? Being dead has nothing to do with "Temporary Safety." Death is kind of permanent.
Personally, I verify everything is working before going out to a gig (turn signals, headlights, license plate lights, brake lights) and it only takes an additional 60 seconds when I'm at my car loading up anyway.
A personal theory of mine (just a theory) is the deficit of state and local funding from DUI arrests. Illinois is not the only state who's officers are cracking down on DUIs and every other form of driving infraction. Since states have outlawed smoking in bars; there simply aren't that many people drinking where they can't smoke. Sure, the die hards still go outside in the freezing cold to smoke; but there number of young people coming of drinking age are simply not flocking to bars where they can't smoke. To counter this loss of revenue...anyone else notice the drastic increase in fines for non-DUI related infraction in their area? A broken tail light was a $50.00 fine...after outlawing smoking in bars it became a $150.00 fine.