• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dingwall Owners Club

A slightly modified euro5 (40DCs instead of aguilars, blend instead of 2nd vol and gotoh resolites) :
Sweet. I've owned Euros and USAs and that's a very USA looking Euro. I've never hesitated to mod my Spectors. My first Euro5 LX I replaced the old EMG 40TW with 40DCs, and the Tone Pump with an Aggie OBP-3. The aggie added the blend also and I much prefer that over v/v.
 
Last edited:
Oooh, that's purdy. I would love to hear how it sounds.
I'll bet it sounds great! In hindsight I wish I had kept the Tone Pump in my first Euro and converted to v/b instead. But it's all good 'cause I'm playing this now. :bassist: Once I heard the B string on a Dingwall I was hooked.


TB05.jpg
 
I have a question, Mr. Dingwall.

I know string posts are shorter on Dingwall basses than standard. If I buy a D-tuner, can I use the original, shorter post on it?

I recommend you use the Extender Key as is. The taller post is not an issue on the lowest string and slightly less down angle is better for return to pitch with that system.
 
I sold my Modulus Q5 after 17 years (Steinberger before that) to buy a Spector. I stuck with them until a couple of years ago when I switched to Dingwall. I find if you stick to high end basses the necks are far more manageable.

Interesting. I have a spector and 2 dingwalls, recently almost bought a q6 (and missed a zon too by not much last year).

I haven't lost a truckload of gear to thievery, but the that stung the most was losing my Modulus Q5 Sweetspot with a gorgeous Spalted Maple top. I also had a Q5W with a Chechen top that was pretty spectacular, but the super-wide neck got to be a pain, literally, after a while. I had a Steinberger L2 back in the day, but I was too poor to keep it. I do love me some graphite necks, though.

My bass bucket list is getting shorter, but somewhere up towards the top are a Status Graphite and a Zon TJ-5...;):thumbsup:

Of course, a Z3 is at the very top of the list!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsonabq
I'll bet it sounds great!

Purely tonally I prefer it to my dingwalls (sacrilege !).
Ergonomically not, it feels like a "classic" already.
It's far from bad though.

Its B string is good but you have to work around it, like all non-dingwall basses I know.
Basically the fact that it's "too" short makes it sound darker and more menacing, so it's easy to do, and cool :)
However for the music I'm doing these days and tuned like we are, in the band context nothing beats the dingwall.

Also I don't get the hate for the tonepump, there are plenty of usable tones in there.
In fact I would probably put one in the purple AB1 to try it out if I could find one with a 3-band eq - that glockenklang is really too neutral for my tastes.
I found a 3-band HAZ but I'm afraid that might be too much lol
 
Purely tonally I prefer it to my dingwalls (sacrilege !).
Ergonomically not, it feels like a "classic" already.
It's far from bad though.

Its B string is good but you have to work around it, like all non-dingwall basses I know.
Basically the fact that it's "too" short makes it sound darker and more menacing, so it's easy to do, and cool :)
However for the music I'm doing these days and tuned like we are, in the band context nothing beats the dingwall.

Also I don't get the hate for the tonepump, there are plenty of usable tones in there.
In fact I would probably put one in the purple AB1 to try it out if I could find one with a 3-band eq - that glockenklang is really too neutral for my tastes.
I found a 3-band HAZ but I'm afraid that might be too much lol
Yeah, I like the Tonepump as well. About the whole 37" vs 35" I think, like you say, it comes down to tonal preferences. I tend to prefer the tone of basses with 35 or even 34" scale length. While I can't deny the overall superior clarity and tightness of the 37" B-string, I may actually prefer the tonal quality of a 34-35" B-string more. A shorter scale adds a certain amount of roughness to the tone which I really like - if that makes sense?
 
Sure, makes sense.
The dingwalls I've played were always very neutral, it has advantages but that's not necessarily what everybody wants.
I mean just look at the number of people in love with p with flats on this forum :) To me that's a sound I just never enjoyed at all.
I mean p with stainless, a pick and an svt ok I get it, but flats played with the thumb, the tone rolled off and a mute under the bridge .. urgh.
But that's normal, to each his own !
 
Sure, makes sense.
The dingwalls I've played were always very neutral, it has advantages but that's not necessarily what everybody wants.
I mean just look at the number of people in love with p with flats on this forum :) To me that's a sound I just never enjoyed at all.
I mean p with stainless, a pick and an svt ok I get it, but flats played with the thumb, the tone rolled off and a mute under the bridge .. urgh.
But that's normal, to each his own !
Neutral is indeed how I'd describe it, too. As someone who prefers his tone on the cleaner (but not sterile or "hifi") end of things, I want the grit of the tone to come more from the instrument and pickups themselves. I like pickups that add natural grit and compression to the tone (i.e. EMG and/or most ceramic dual coil soapbars), as well as a more complex midrange character (not necessarily the amount of midrange, but rather the character of the midrange). I find these qualities (midrange and compression) to be more present in 34" and 35" scale basses.
 
Quantity and quality are often very intertwined though.
This is a difficult debate and my opinion varied a lot in the past and still does from time to time.
I mean the dingwalls are my basses with the most yet the clearest midrange, while the spector has tons of midrange character despite sounding rather scooped.
And as soon as you EQ all hell breaks loose, depending on the type and how it's set you can adjust quantity without losing the quality - or you can't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Owl
Quantity and quality are often very intertwined though.
This is a difficult debate and my opinion varied a lot in the past and still does from time to time.
I mean the dingwalls are my basses with the most yet the clearest midrange, while the spector has tons of midrange character despite sounding rather scooped.
And as soon as you EQ all hell breaks loose, depending on the type and how it's set you can adjust quantity without losing the quality - or you can't.
Yeah, like I said, it's not so much a question of the amount of midrange, but rather the tonality or tonal quality of the midrange. There's no doubt my ABHS had lots of midrange; it's just that the midrange was very punchy and clear, rather than warm and fuzzy. I tend to prefer the latter.

When I bring this up in discussions, people mistake this for wanting to add external drive or distortion, but that is not what I am talking about.
 
I know what you mean.

This is a big problem when describing sounds generally, I say I want it to sound ample and loud and big and people understand more headroom or more volume when in fact it's the opposite, compressed sounds big, infinite clean headroom sounds awfully boring.

It's the same for bass frequencies, if they are faithfully reproduced sure you can eq more of them in, but it just sounds like the same old boring stuff, except with more bass.
I like when bass is presented with a small delay, as if it was so huge that the playback system has difficulties to represent it :
7beL0oNSqlVK3pF23G3Q_mesures.jpg

I suppose the classic tube amp sag is some variation of that, can't be sure though - I didn't have the time to analyze it seriously.

For the mids well I want gnarly and aggressive, unfortunately I did not find the secret sauce for that yet (except taking the right bass and playing that of course) but I'm sure it's out there :)
 
I know what you mean.

This is a big problem when describing sounds generally, I say I want it to sound ample and loud and big and people understand more headroom or more volume when in fact it's the opposite, compressed sounds big, infinite clean headroom sounds awfully boring.

It's the same for bass frequencies, if they are faithfully reproduced sure you can eq more of them in, but it just sounds like the same old boring stuff, except with more bass.
I like when bass is presented with a small delay, as if it was so huge that the playback system has difficulties to represent it :
View attachment 3843943
I suppose the classic tube amp sag is some variation of that, can't be sure though - I didn't have the time to analyze it seriously.

For the mids well I want gnarly and aggressive, unfortunately I did not find the secret sauce for that yet (except taking the right bass and playing that of course) but I'm sure it's out there :)
Finally, someone who speaks language! :D
 
Purely tonally I prefer it to my dingwalls (sacrilege !).
Ergonomically not, it feels like a "classic" already.
It's far from bad though.

Its B string is good but you have to work around it, like all non-dingwall basses I know.
Basically the fact that it's "too" short makes it sound darker and more menacing, so it's easy to do, and cool :)
However for the music I'm doing these days and tuned like we are, in the band context nothing beats the dingwall.

Also I don't get the hate for the tonepump, there are plenty of usable tones in there.
In fact I would probably put one in the purple AB1 to try it out if I could find one with a 3-band eq - that glockenklang is really too neutral for my tastes.
I found a 3-band HAZ but I'm afraid that might be too much lol

Yeah, I like the Tonepump as well. About the whole 37" vs 35" I think, like you say, it comes down to tonal preferences. I tend to prefer the tone of basses with 35 or even 34" scale length. While I can't deny the overall superior clarity and tightness of the 37" B-string, I may actually prefer the tonal quality of a 34-35" B-string more. A shorter scale adds a certain amount of roughness to the tone which I really like - if that makes sense?

I really dug the Tonepump. I had a couple of Euro Spectors and I always thought the Tonepump was a very usable preamp. All the Spector guys get so caught up in the "Gotta have a HAZ" hype, that they just automatically dismiss the TP. The TP is a legit preamp. The Euro 4 that I had was the LOUDEST bass I've ever owned, and it was glorious! LMAO!
 
  • Like
Reactions: graphics1988
Hey all. I have my Super PJ5 listed for sale or trade. I love it but am more comfortable on the 37" scale ABs and Z's. I am VERY open to a trade for a newer model active AB1 straight up (or cash added as necessary) or a Z3 with cash from me. All the details on my PJ can be found at the for sale link below. Comes with a Super Fatty J neck pickup as well.

Cheers

For Sale/Trade - Dingwall Super PJ5

1.jpg
3.jpg