• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dingwall Owners Club

I agree with almost all of this but the current standard Super J look here just doesn’t work for me. The three knobs looking like they’re just floating away on that lovely blue sea as the control plate has been removed.
I get why the design changed, that x top shows us pretty clearly. The massive space between the controls irks me for some reason, just having those three knobs closer together would be a better look

I'm a 'traditionalist' - I have a soft spot for the old control plate. I still say that Leo would be amazed at Sheldon's take on his venerable jazz bass. :cool:
 
I agree with almost all of this but the current standard Super J look here just doesn’t work for me. The three knobs looking like they’re just floating away on that lovely blue sea as the control plate has been removed.
I get why the design changed, that x top shows us pretty clearly. The massive space between the controls irks me for some reason, just having those three knobs closer together would be a better look

i am deciding between a super p and j.
I think if i did a super j i would go active… simply for the improved aesthetics of the 6 knobs. I agree that the three look a but too much on their lonesome.
 
Then I guess we won't be talking about how some non-offset body basses think they can pull off fan frets ..
Like the Ibanez SR fanned frets? Blech. Played one in a shop and disliked everything about it, from tone to looks to ergonomics. Or most of Kiesel's fanned fret basses? Meh. Ugly.

That Maruszczyk would be ugly even as a parallel fret bass, but maybe slightly less so.

I guess I'm in the minority of not minding the 3-knob SJ layout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nuage420
I guess I'm in the minority of not minding the 3-knob SJ layout.

they are logically placed. That doesn’t bother me one bit.

one thing I know I’ve discovered about passive models that could be active. I always wish they had a dummy battery compartment. Even if it was just used for an apple airtag or picks, or “ you put your weeeed in there” or whatever. I’d spec the routing this way for sure.
 
Like the Ibanez SR fanned frets? Blech. Played one in a shop and disliked everything about it, from tone to looks to ergonomics. Or most of Kiesel's fanned fret basses? Meh. Ugly.

That Maruszczyk would be ugly even as a parallel fret bass, but maybe slightly less so.

I guess I'm in the minority of not minding the 3-knob SJ layout.
IMO, the series/parallel switches make the 3-knob real estate look less empty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wavemaker
I prefer the Jazz jack plate too, but that's just because it's what I am used to. I could get used to it without.
What you are visually used to is a big factor. I have found that if i stick to a bass i like a lot visually… anything that varies from that i like less. But if i then put that aside and let myself open up to a new aesthetic… i can get beyond my “visual expectations.” For a while anything not fso ar ric shaped had zero appeal to me.

now if i play my dingwalls a lot… anything with straight frets looks odd.
 
Or most of Kiesel's fanned fret basses? Meh. Ugly.
I have one and I LOVE playing it, and it's mostly beautiful, but there's just something visual about it that keeps me from loving it fully. I am keeping it for now because it sounds and feels so good but I want to get my hands on a dingwall SJ and hope it feels and plays as great, they just look so much better
 
  • Like
Reactions: IronSpatula