BurningSkies
CRAZY BALDHEAD
- Feb 20, 2005
- 27,956
- 20,348
- Disclosures
- Endorsing artist: Dingwall Guitars
Somebody ordered a camo Z?
Yep. Camo Z3 in a mixed wood marquetry. I'm sure that the shop's been saving the top scraps for a good long time.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Somebody ordered a camo Z?
You know what I'd love to see? A Dingwall done in the Carl Thompson style, lots of stringers and laminates of various exotic woods.
The back is smooth as glass down in the first few positions, it's incredible. Further up you can feel some seems if you feel perpendicular across the seems, but you can't feel them when you're playing. Under prolonged humidity the seams are slightly more pronounced but still a non issue....a small price to pay for only adjusting the truss rod once since I got the bass in '95.You've got a bit more wear and tear on that than I do on my voodoo. You've put in some time.How's the back of the neck?
The back is smooth as glass down in the first few positions, it's incredible. Further up you can feel some seems if you feel perpendicular across the seems, but you can't feel them when you're playing. Under prolonged humidity the seams are slightly more pronounced but still a non issue....a small price to pay for only adjusting the truss rod once since I got the bass in '95.
Hmm. Using wood to make camouflage to hide... in the woods?
I'm not the camo type either, but this looks good. I hope it's not a recent photo because, going by the serial number, it would mean there are still about 87 basses ahead of my order. :-(
Mine is a 9 piece neck, I'm not sure if was poly finished, I think it may have been waxed or oiled as well. It came with a film canister of "Dingwall Neck Wax", that I still have(amazing stuff!). I think I remember the reasoning behind not sealing the back of neck having something to do with the movementbor ebb n flow of the wood with only one half finished.Mine is very much similar. I know the bodies of this era are a hardened oil finish, but I'm guessing the necks are poly finished. Is yours a 11-stringer neck? It looks to date to sometime fairly soon after mine. I have the body decal, straight pickups (That weren't the 'standard' size Barts at the time but 4-string sized)...but no decal on the control plate. I know that the original proto was January 1993...
But the Rastaburst I've gone through the finish to varying degrees from about 2 through 9 at this point. Nothing too serious, but it's there. I have some Tru oil waiting to treat it but haven't had a chance.
Mine is a 9 piece neck, I'm not sure if was poly finished, I think it may have been waxed or oiled as well. It came with a film canister of "Dingwall Neck Wax", that I still have(amazing stuff!). I think I remember the reasoning behind not sealing the back of neck having something to do with the movementbor ebb n flow of the wood with only one half finished.
In terms of date all the serial # info was lost in the fire but the heal of the neck says, "Namm 95". I don't know if it ever made it to the show but I'm sure it must've been being built in 1994.
I bet the outer laminates (at the headstock edges and/or neck heel would account for two additional lams on your neck.That's like many of the Dingwall necks that people think are 3 pc are actually 5pc.
The idea with wax was that moisture could evenly enter/exit the neck with a wax finish allowing it to stay straighter. I don't know that I buy that, but that was the idea. Either way, the Voodoo Prima I have has a glossy hard finish of some kind.
View attachment 2766657
View attachment 2766658
The 'hearsay' on mine is that it's one of the first of 'about 12' production basses It's got hallmarks of the earliest run although the SN is a bit wonky, suggesting a little later than some I've seen. But then we also know there were some SN errors along the way where some basses were non-sequentially numbered. So this one is maybe 94 or possibly just a bit earlier.]............
View attachment 2766733
Here's a shot of mine, definitely 9 pieces. My serial # is lower than yours, but the pickups and logo tell the full story....
I bet the outer laminates (at the headstock edges and/or neck heel would account for two additional lams on your neck.That's like many of the Dingwall necks that people think are 3 pc are actually 5pc.
The idea with wax was that moisture could evenly enter/exit the neck with a wax finish allowing it to stay straighter. I don't know that I buy that, but that was the idea. Either way, the Voodoo Prima I have has a glossy hard finish of some kind.
View attachment 2766657
View attachment 2766658
The 'hearsay' on mine is that it's one of the first of 'about 12' production basses It's got hallmarks of the earliest run although the SN is a bit wonky, suggesting a little later than some I've seen. But then we also know there were some SN errors along the way where some basses were non-sequentially numbered. So this one is maybe 94 or possibly just a bit earlier.
For those who haven't played at home, sharpen your earballs... here's some pics...what features or lack of features can you notice that would tip you off that this is a really early one? :
View attachment 2766659
View attachment 2766660
View attachment 2766661
View attachment 2766662
View attachment 2766663
Sperzel tuners, for one...