• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do you find natural finish ugly?

Not unless the wood is actually ugly.

On the other hand, opaque instruments immediately say "budget" to me because all the cheapest instruments are made out of wood that is not suitable for display. I realize there are many expensive and well made painted instruments out there but even then it is safe to assume that under the paint is something inferior.

EDIT: An alternative might be a painted finish that shows the woodgrain through, again assuming it looks good.
vb5-rtf-b-ash-at-tn-stf-ktb-redsaber-palemoonfb-iod-iab-dsls-139250_gallery.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: B-Mac
I never liked completely naked natural finish with pale looking woods (I love natural oil finish on darker wood like Walnut or Rosewood though)

If it's a pale looking wood like Maple, I like them have sort of vintage/yellow tint to it, still have that natural finish look but look less boring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobro
I think its all about the pickguard on a natural finish bass. Wood is wood with different grain structure. The pickguard makes it. Guitars without pickguards really demonstrate this in my opinion.