• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Does a VH/Roth reunion without Michael piss you off?

Did anyone notice that MA has been 'shopped out of the cover of the debut album on the VH website? And that Women and Children First has had the cover photo removed entirely? That's the final straw for me. To proceed without Mike is one thing, and that's fine. To attempt to erase him from a long history is unconscionable.

Eddie must be hanging with Sharon Osbourne, next they will be replacing Anthony's parts on the first few albums. Revisionist history in music really bugs me! Greedy pigs!!!
 
Well, it would be nice to have Michael around. I can't help but think though that maybe he is better off just out of this whole thing.

+1

I expect this tour will fall apart before the second week anyway.
Michael Anthony has put up with enough crap already.
As for his bass playing, he wasn't that flashy, but he was rock solid 100 percent of the time.
Eddie also did a few bass tracks on OU812 IIRC. Which I think would be a little insulting, to say the least.
 
VH without MA! What's next, Wham without George Michaels?

Does it really matter? When reunions like this happen, it makes me think that the members have run out of $ and they are coming back to the well to take another drink.
There is enough new music other here with concert tickets that are affordable. It would be better if VH made news with some new music and not with who or who isn't playing with the band.

G
 
As a bass player, yes it makes me mad, it's not the first time a bass player is expendable (Zepplin & Queen reunions)

The sad truth is non musician fans probably don't really care, unless the bass player is the lead singer or an icon like JE. Yeah they might feel sorry a bit, but that's about it. It just means more money in their pockets, loosing another opinion as well.
 
No one has mentioned how totally cordial, gracious and warm Michael was (as was Sammy) at the RRHOF induction ceremony in his comments about Ed having a speedy recovery. A total standup guy. Ed's out of his mind.

Lonnybass
 
Van Halen's become nothing more than a parody of itself. It's really sad to say that there are many tribute bands that sound better than the Van Halen of now. It's also sad to see the VH brothers burning bridges with friends and fans alike.

I'd rather see Mike, Sammy and Gary Cherone than this abomination called Van Halen.

jerry said:
Eddie must be hanging with Sharon Osbourne, next they will be replacing Anthony's parts on the first few albums. Revisionist history in music really bugs me! Greedy pigs!!!

MA's even been replaced by Wolfie on the cover of Van Halen. Despicable!
 
As a bass player, yes it makes me mad, it's not the first time a bass player is expendable (Zepplin & Queen reunions)


I agree with you on the Led Zeppelin one, but I don't with the Queen one. John Deacon retired, but gave his blessing to Brian May and John Taylor to do the tour. Plus the guy they chose totally rips playing the lines live.

But I do agree: No MA = No VH
 
Well, what can you expect, asking this question on a bass forum...

I never cared about VH or Anthony. Still, he is definitely the guy for that band. It's hard to imagine anyone substituting (much less the guitarist young kid who may or may not be able to play.) Who's going to do all those vocals - are they hiring backup singers?

But regardless of all that they will sell a zillion tickets because Roth is back and I'm sure for a lot of the diehards that makes it "legitimate."
 
As a bass player, yes it makes me mad, it's not the first time a bass player is expendable (Zepplin & Queen reunions)

The sad truth is non musician fans probably don't really care, unless the bass player is the lead singer or an icon like JE. Yeah they might feel sorry a bit, but that's about it. It just means more money in their pockets, loosing another opinion as well.

I agree with you, it always seems like the drummer and the bassist chairs are fit to be taken by anyone who can play the songs, with no regard given to the "authenticity" of the reunion!
 
Ever notice how Eddie still acts as though this is some kind of garage band? He loves to create drama for the sake of drama and kicks out/brings in players based on his whims. For me, he's just one unprofessional guy and always has been. Sure he was a 'pioneer' in his day, but throwing MA out of the band was yet another in a long list of immature decisions.

I like MA as a rock bassist - he had image, was integral with his unique backing vocals and stayed in the pocket well with a completely overrated drummer.
 
That photochopped cover of VH1 on their website is pretty juvenile! :scowl:

Pretty sad that the VH's feel like they have to make some kind of a statement by doing that!:mad:

Oh well, I dumped them after 1984.

Van Hagar was tolerable.

Van Charrone was whatever it was.:confused:

But I've zero desire to see Geriatric Halen and spawn.
 
. . . Van Halen's become nothing more than a parody of itself. . . Despicable!

+1.

:rollno:

These guys' egos just destroyed their minds, long time ago. I wouldn't be surprised that they cancel the tour half way because Eddie and David Lee Roth got into a fight. Watch. . .

I hope that Sammy and Michael have been wise with their money and are now enjoying their retirement (with the casual Hagar tour) as normal human beings.
 

Latest posts