I'm not advocating, nor criticizing owning one of these, but i'm curious what you see wrong with buying a $17 bass? What is the right $ amount for you that a purchase of a bass is justified? (please don't take this as a personal attack, this goes for everyone criticizing these). I'm honestly curious. Is buying a $17 bass, for whatever purpose - sitting at home on the back porch, all the way to gigging live, any worse than buying a $300 bass? what about a $3000 bass? What about a $6000 bass? There aren't always guarantees on what you're getting for spending more money. I'm just curious where the line stands?
IMO, someone spending $17 on a bass knows what they are about to receive, and what they are going to use it for. But who cares?
On the other hand, what about the person buying the $3000 bass and sitting at home, or even gigging, once a month, making $300 as a band? (so take home is $100 or less). (Again, who cares?)
Shouldn't they (we) receive the same criticism? Yet we seem to praise the expensive instrument purchases (I get jealous sometimes of those pretty dingwalls).
This is just a question, not in any way an attack on anyone, buying a $17 dollar bass, nor a $6000 bass.