Not shocking when a health care system is profit driven.
Pfizer et al have no motivation to study Ebola from the last African outbreak but socialized medical systems like Canada's have been. You're welcome.
Unfortunately, greed seems to have been driving the response to the crisis from the outset. The CDC directors reasoning for not banning flights as of yet is laughable ("Charter flights are too slow????") and I suspect has much more to do with keeping the flight industries/lobbiyists pockets lined up until the last possible minute, than doing what countries like Ghana have done. Ghana stands to lose much more economically than the US, yet they had the common sense to ban all movements from the affected counties. I heard a report this morning that covered why the price of chocolate as a commodity is rising and will continue to rise in the coming months. Since their borders are officially closed to the affected countries, Liberians who make up the greatest portion of Coco bean pickers on Ghana farms can't get over the border to pick the fruit. This is obviously having a tremendous impact on both the farmers and workers.
If Ebola makes it into Ghana, the farmers will scatter to the winds, driving the prices up even further and having an even bigger impact on their economy. If Ghana is willing to take the hit at great cost to them in order to prevent the spread, why is the US dragging it's feet on restrictions? It seems to defy logic.