There are opportunists in all fields. Even 1970s groundbreaking sitcoms.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
There are opportunists in all fields. Even 1970s groundbreaking sitcoms.

He didn't launch Tesla...The Musk that launched Tesla and SpaceX is not, I'm fairly confident, the Musk that exists today.
If I had $250 billion that I made from starting and developing a half dozen highly successful companies...
He didn't launch Tesla...
"Tesla was incorporated in July 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning as Tesla Motors. The company's name is a tribute to inventor and electrical engineer Nikola Tesla. In February 2004, via a $6.5 million investment, Elon Musk became the company's largest shareholder."
He is, however, an excellent hustler and bulls****er.
That unfairly diminishes the work of the actual engineers that developed the vehicles. Elon is the bankroll.I'm not a Musk apologist, but you are way off base here. He is one of the relatively few people who can take ideas and turn them into successful products. Tesla as we know it and Space X don't exist without Musk. That's not the work of a con man.
That unfairly diminishes the work of the actual engineers that developed the vehicles. Elon is the bankroll.
Actually, you are, and he IS a con man.I'm not a Musk apologist...
Some would say the same thing about Thomas Edison.
Having a visionary make the big picture decisions doesn't discredit the engineers or any of the people working for him. I would compare him to Steve Jobs, who never really engineered his products, but was instrumental in bringing technology to market. Apple quickly started circling the drain in his absence.
One of the things I appreciate about this conversation thus far has been the ability for most contributors to differentiate between how they feel about the man without discrediting him for some of the successful accomplishments in his life.
-Mike
Yes, Musk is a complex person. Categorizing him with a single descriptor is simple-minded.
Instead of labelling a person as an apologist, let’s just say that I the post is something of an apologia— but I think there is some validity in the claim that he isn’t exactly a con man.Actually, you are, and he IS a con man.
Yes, Musk is a complex person. Categorizing him with a single descriptor is simple-minded.
Oh, I can think of a few, narcissist being the most publishable here, that could sum him up just fine.
There are no good billionaires.
Absolutisms are ridiculous.There are no good billionaires.
An unimportant role? Without funding and vision, little happens. If we took the sum total of wealth across the glove and distributed it equally among the inhabitants, we'd all have about $7k. We couldn't fund or accomplish anything. The fact that Musk is willing to invest his considerable capital in space travel, electric vehicles, internet accessibility, free speech, and other societally mutually beneficial endeavors should be a cause for celebration.That unfairly diminishes the work of the actual engineers that developed the vehicles. Elon is the bankroll.