The sunburst didn't wear away, it was stripped down to bare wood.I'm not sure exactly what it is. A clear coat? An amber coat? Just the sunburst wearing off?
The resulting hue of the "natural finish is partly the characteristic of the wood itself, combined with several years of aging since the re-finsh was done. (assuming several decades ago)
Tinted clear coat (lacquer) would be the best way to mimic it. I would not recommend staining the wood, but people do.
Q: Why not just get a Warmoth body and save yourself a whole lot of trouble (and time) having to strip it?I wanted to refin a newer one to that color
I would not assume that at all.your user name implies you’re a dealer
Well, regardless of anything else, a pro quality re-fin always trumps a bad re-fin.What’s more valuable ........... bad refin job (or strip), or a modern, well done refin with very good relicing?
Depending on the bass, having a vintage bass properly re-finished may not increase the value significantly - maybe not anymore than the re-finish cost itself - but it certainly wouldn't de-value it further, and likely "appeal" to a wider audience.
Personally, with few exceptions, if you're not crazy about a bass with a bad DIY re-fin, I'd absolutely have it restored properly, by a qualified shop. If you'd appreciate & enjoy the bass more - why not?!
Disclaimer; I do have '68 Tele bass & a '75 P w/ "hippie" finishes (otherwise all original). I'll likely have them re-stored in the coming year.
I don't want to be a pinhead no more!

AND NOW BACK TO OUR REGULAR pre-CBS Programing
Last edited:
