TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Very nice! Should come alive with rounds. Have you tried Elixirs?
Alright pre cbs guys. Just seen this new post. I'm not the one to be asking about all the details but I know you here will be able to hit me with the yeahs and no's. As far as what's right or not with it. I know I've never seen knobs like this for starters and the dots don't seem right either.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
View attachment 793282

Hard to tell from the photo, but the dots don't look like they are clay. ...
A big enough buckle, combined with hand that don't sweat that much (or low acidic sweat) would make since. If I really tried, I could get that buckle rash in a week, it would take years for anything else to wear though.The bass being sold as a '64 has more wrong than right. You mean to tell me that a bass that was played enough to have that much heavy belt buckle wear has no gouges in the wood, and minimal thumb wear on the back of the neck? Come on.
The one blurry pic of the bass being sold as a '63 makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up in a bad way.
You're right, I just looked at it on my computer (not my phone) and the wood looks unmarred.No way something as coarse as a belt buckle would cause that heavy finish wear and not mark the wood.
The blindingly white guard on the burst is only one of its' problems. I'd avoid both like the plague.
Cripula,
That 1960 P is lovely. My dad owned one and traded it back the following year towards his Jazz. He's told me repeatedly that he wished he'd kept it AND picked up the Jazz. But he then says (jokingly) "I didn't know I could have more than one bass!"
No! Well at least you still get to visit.Sad story, 1967-2007. Sold to save my house in a divorce. I still have visiting rights with a friend.