I did not expect Costa Rico to have made it this far. I thought they were going to come in dead last in their group. I'm more impressed by their team than team USA.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It just seems to me that you think whilst you make your baby steps, the front runners aren't also moving forward too.
It's a perpetual game of catch up.
Of course those nations are further ahead than they were 10, 20, 30 years ago, but they - like the US - are still a million miles from putting out the best eleven footballers in the world.
Matante I can't quite understand your insistence on trying to make this discussion about football a cultural difference debate.
It's not about cultural diferences: You have an opinion which is a guess about future performance, Titus and others have an opposing guess about future performance.
It's all clairvoyance and nothing to do with cultural differences - YMMV, IMHO etc.
However, if you apply a business perspective to this, a common perspective would be that past performance and behaviour is the best predictor of future performance - I wouldn't invest in an average performing business because it's supporters told me they believed it will be the best.
Get a track record of achievement, show me progress and development on a consistent basis and then I'll look at it.
There was the NASL.They even had Pelé on the New York Cosmos. That would be the equivalient of sending Wayne Gretzky to a Nicaraguan ice hockey league in the 80s. Soccer's popularity never quite caught onThe US didn't qualify for the World Cup between 1950 and 1986. (In 1950, they qualified by losing one and drawing one against Cuba.) Since 1990, the US has qualified for every World Cup, and each qualification has become progressively "easier" in the sense of results.
20 years ago the US did not have a professional league. It now has one which is growing and expanding, as well as a second division which is expanding.
20 years ago, American children who played "soccer" did not know there was such a thing as professional soccer leagues. They thought pro soccer was the World Cup every four years. Today, American kids start from the early stages dreaming of playing for Barcelona or Man U. They want to be the next Messi. 20 years ago, they would not have known that Messi or Man U existed.
"Pro Soccer" is the second most popular sport among young people in America, with only American football ahead of it. 20 years ago anyone would have laughed in your face for saying that would be the case in 20 years.
Now I never said I predicted a US victory any time soon. I only said it could happen, one day and everyone suddenly pounced on me like a was delusional.
The Dutch were nothing up to and through the '60s. They were arguably the best team of the '70s. The French, fed up with mediocrity, decided to get organized and become good at the sport in the '70s, when the government started a national academy system and mandated that every first division club had to run a youth system, and by 1986 they had one of the best teams. You know what's happened since then.
I don't think you appreciate just how much of a fringe sport football has been in this country. Our federation couldn't even pay the rent for their office or pay for players' uniforms at times. This is a country of over 300 million (sports crazy) people, who up until very recently did not care a rat's ass about football and who now do. And their children care more. And their children will care even more. I know my country and I know what's going to happen. We're going to get good.
I think that growing up with the game here probably means that Titus has forgotten more about football than any American will ever know, but on this occasion I'm going to agree to some extent (so it's a mere difference of opinion, rather than a cultural one). Greece won the Euros in 2004. Any team can win any tournament. That's what makes sports great.
I remember the shock when Boris Becker won at Wimbledon in 1985. All the experts were saying at the start of the championships that he'd stand a chance of winning it in the next three or four years. It took him two weeks.
I'm only posting this because the Holland CR game is so dull. Typical World Cup - there's so much to lose in the later stages that teams just stop playing with any flow or momentum.
There was the NASL.They even had Pelé on the New York Cosmos. That would be the equivalient of sending Wayne Gretzky to a Nicaraguan ice hockey league in the 80s. Soccer's popularity never quite caught on
So where are all the world class English, Scottish, Irish players - if it's about structures we should have been producing them for years?
There was the NASL.They even had Pelé on the New York Cosmos. That would be the equivalient of sending Wayne Gretzky to a Nicaraguan ice hockey league in the 80s. Soccer's popularity never quite caught on
disgracefulBrazil game: Brazil played some of the most disgusting, cynical football I've ever seen. They went out with the intention of intimidating Rodriguez out of the game and cynically fouling Colombia at every turn - youd almost think they knew they weren't getting booked. Colombia were getting no protection from the ref and resorted to the same ugly brand of football.
Whatever about interpretation of the rules - and that in itself is an example of how corrupt and morally bankrupt this FIFA shower are-those officials stand out as way worse than any others and put players in danger, Neymar was the biggest on field victim - the bigger victim was the game.
Disgusting.
no one believed in the interwebs either now it's one of our few products.Matante I can't quite understand your insistence on trying to make this discussion about football a cultural difference debate.
It's not about cultural diferences: You have an opinion which is a guess about future performance, Titus and others have an opposing guess about future performance.
It's all clairvoyance and nothing to do with cultural differences - YMMV, IMHO etc.
However, if you apply a business perspective to this, a common perspective would be that past performance and behaviour is the best predictor of future performance - I wouldn't invest in an average performing business because it's supporters told me they believed it will be the best.
Get a track record of achievement, show me progress and development on a consistent basis and then I'll look at it.
I smell piss & vinegarIt just seems to me that you think whilst you make your baby steps, the front runners aren't also moving forward too.
It's a perpetual game of catch up.
Of course those nations are further ahead than they were 10, 20, 30 years ago, but they - like the US - are still a million miles from putting out the best eleven footballers in the world.
I hope it's good no more fractured vertebraeWell, we´ll have great semi finals games (or names at least)
I believe that both European teams will reach the final.
ha thanks brahOh and lads, I'll put up the official semi-final predictions and a table update tomorrow, too many glasses of wine tonight to risk making a mistake at this stage!![]()
the good thing is everyone's into it; it's not just brazil italy & germany any moreI understand what you're saying. The USA could conceivably win it, but it could just as easily be Japan or Australia or Nigeria.
(Or even,on this showing, Costa Rica.)
Agreed, can we close on this aspect lads, it's not going anywhere...You're overthinking it. All I'm saying is that just because you've suddenly realised that it's a good game, then throwing everything you've got at it won't make you world champions.
Population size is irrelevant, by the way.
But have the last word, by all means. I shall continue to watch you dream big and achieve small.
Piss and vinegar? Nah...just a huge amount of meh at more "we are Americans and we can do anything".
I'm bailing on this particular aspect of the thread.
Anyway....
Brazil 0 - 2 Germany
Argentina 1 - 2 Holland