• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fireglo or Walnut Ric 4003, and why?

Buying a New Rickenbacker 4003, my choices are:


  • Total voters
    225
4004 flamed maple FireGlo

24x.jpg
 
Last edited:
If it were any other bass than a Ric, I'd say pick the color you like best. Since it's a Ric I suggest trying each individual bass on its own merits and picking which one feels best. They vary so much bass to bass you can't just pick one off the shelf by color alone. If you do, chances for disappointment are high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: woodyng2
Never tried the walnut...is it just brighter?

Almost impossible to do here in North Queensland (@RedVee not Far NQ, that's them flaky tourist-wallahs from Cairns!).
Would you elaborate a touch on what you found to be different?

I found that the Walnut has a bit of a quicker attack and a brighter overall character to it. It's possible that this is entirely due to the maple fretboard alone. It's a little difficult to put the tonal difference that I noticed into words and the above is probably an over simplification. I hope that helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ox Boris
No wrong answer here! I already have a Fireglo (1989 4003) and my plan is to get a Walnut 4003s and convert it to a 5 string. Also, I'd jump on a deal on a 90's V64 or 4003s if I came upon one...