TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ah, vive la difference! That is one thing I don't like about them. I can't stand twangy G-strings with the repertoire I play that needs even tone through out the registers.Pyramids are darker than La Bella except for the G string. After the break-in period, the G gets a bit poppy and that's one of the best things about those strings. You play deep, dark, and thumpy, and you throw a nice high pop in every now and then if you pluck the string hard enough. It's like an added bonus! ; )
You too? I totally had the same reaction. I always use this sound as an example of what Labellas sound like to me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9Wx8BRjzoI
Good for some things, not a string I want to use for everything.
Example:
LaBella
Pyramid
GHS Precision
Ti's
Sadowsky
Chromes
GHS Bright
Rotisound 77
I notice Roto 77's make more than one person's list as the brightest. Are they significantly brighter than Chromes? Are the Rotos around the same tension as Chromes when compared to to them in the same gauge? It's sounding like I need to try a set of these.
Ah, vive la difference! That is one thing I don't like about them. I can't stand twangy G-strings with the repertoire I play that needs even tone through out the registers.
My biggest frustration has been break in time and unbalanced tone on the darker brands (Pyramid, LaBella and GHS). The ones with brighter tone seem to have balanced tone across all strings from day one. The darker ones can take a year or two before they sound right.
Don't let the cheetahs get you. That's my experience also: deep, dark, woody, hollow, etc. I'd call it "scooped," but that would imply a top and a bottom with the middle taken out. With the GHS, once they settle in, really not much top, either. So from that perspective, I can see why folks will call them "scooped" or "not scooped."Meh, you just need to let those GHS'es wear in.
And if GHS P flats are scooped, I'm a zebra from now on.
Don't let the cheetahs get you. That's my experience also: deep, dark, woody, hollow, etc. I'd call it "scooped," but that would imply a top and a bottom with the middle taken out. With the GHS, once they settle in, really not much top, either. So from that perspective, I can see why folks will call them "scooped" or "not scooped."
I'll leave the rest of the scooping to the zoo hands.
Yes, indeed. That's what those who love them love about them, especially with a low-q amp and at least one 15-inch driver in the array, with a slightly smaller enclosure to get a good mid-bass bump around 150 Hz to go with it.I see where you're coming from. When the strings are new, they have a slight HIGH-mid scoop, but once they wear out, it becomes more of a low-mid bump, if you know what I mean.
Number one, I posted that 4 months ago.Jeezez... again ? christ man, let it go
go and be happy with your roundwounds![]()
Revision of revised Darkest to Brightest
Pyramid
GHS Precision
LaBella
Ti's
Sadowsky
Fender
Chromes
GHS Bright
Rotisound 77
Does look roughly accurate?
Wheres EB and DR at ?