TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I haven't used the regular ones but......these, besides looking really nice, have a good amount of tension, are quite smooth, very punchy with decent mids, good lows. I have tried Chromes, EB's. These are my favorite so far.I didn't know about these flats. Can you compare them to the regular Deep Talkin' Flats?
From the marketing description they sound very interesting.
My Warwick has D'Addario Prelude 4/4 Cello strings (nickel flatwound), tuned C2-G2-D3-A3. My StingRay has TI Jazz Flats, and I've just ordered a set of Rotosound Jazz Bass 77 flats for my Jazz Plus V.
In stock in my studio are: TI Jazz Flats JF345 (plus some singles); Rotosound RS776LD, RS77LE, and SM77 (for an experiment later with the StingRay in fifths, C1-G1-D2-A2); and a pack of Ernie Ball Group Something or Others (III? 45-105 I think).
I've also just sent a letter to D'Addario about the possibility of using 1/10 or 1/8 Double Bass Helicore Orchestra strings on the StingRay.
i found a set of fender flatwounds that I'm told are discontinued. They are stainless steel flatwounds green package custom light 45-105. Any review of these? How do they compare to the chormes I have now?
Here's the thread I started back in March of 2016, when Fender had just re-introduced the 9050CL (45-60-80-105).
It's back! - Fender 9050CL 45-60-80-105
This was when I was a "balanced tension enthusiast" and needless to say, I was very disappointed when Fender decided to discontinue them for the second time after only a year. That said, if I were to use them again today, I'd be happy with the 9050L (45-60-80-100) as the actual difference between the 100E and the 105E is not night and day.
I do prefer the 9050s over the D'A Chromes for their tonal character as well as their overall playing feel.


