Hey everyone, I was wondering if I could get some Club input on some specs I'm going to settle on within the week. I'll absolutely be talking to the guys at Fodera for their opinions, but I know many of you are very experienced with spec'ing basses and I never have before - so I think I could learn a lot from your collective input.
The specs I know it will have:
5-String Monarch
17.5mm spacing
22 fret
Black hardware
Dual coils with no exposed poles
Ebony or Rosewood ramp
Top will be one of the "non-upcharges", Maple or Walnut
I don't really "rock" too often, I mostly play funk, world music, jam and some hip-hop. I want a bass that is generally a tad on the warm side, but articulate with enough sizzle for a good slap tone. For this reason, I've generally been thinking of going with a warm wood for the body and a bright wood for the board. Am I wrong for thinking this, would it be better to go bright body and warm board? I would generally rather EQ into brightness, and have the default be moderately warm, than EQ out of brightness, if that makes sense.
Here are the two routes I think would fit the bill for me:
1. Mahogony body - Ebony board - Alder tone block
2. Walnut body - Pau Ferro board - Alder tone block (Or ash?)
My preferred tone, I think, would come from:
3. Walnut body/Maple board instrument, but I don't think I can afford the up charge for the maple board.
Weight isn't a huge issue for me, but balance is. I am also concerned that if I get a brighter board and a warmer body the balance may suffer, rather than having a denser body with a warmer board. My only other consideration is aesthetic in nature, I generally like some contrast, but not at the expense of tone. But if there is a recipe that allows for both, that'd be a plus.
Does anyone have any input/adjectives on how they would anticipate these combos would sound? Even if just in comparison to one another? Any other ideas/things/tricks I may not know about?