Unrepresented
Something Borderline Offensive
We've evolved psychologically to struggle with the paradox of viewing other humans as both friend and foe. Other humans are a threat, potentially a deadly one, yet we also recognize them as our closest allies in survival on this planet.Can you elaborate on that? And in what way does that apply to vengeance/forgiveness?
Forgiveness is a peacekeeping activity, typically an act by a lower ranking member of the social order. I liken it to the omega wolves rolling onto their backs to maintain morale in the pack, when the alphas challenge them. It's a trust display.
You can get all the omegas you want to play cowboys and Indians with you, but only so long as they recognize that they're omegas. If they attempt to invert the social order, you must remind them of their ranking: vengeance.
Yeah, it's kinda paradoxical, no man is an island, but we all want as much ocean front property as we can steal.And the snake who swallows his own tail is immortal.
If you're fearing reprisal, you're either lacking in juice or insufficient with your vengeance levels.Yep, but don't forget that many people leave loved ones behind. If you happen to kill someone who has loved ones, you might find yourself killed if one of them is also vindictive.
Self-defense is a euphemism, it's just instant vengeance.Perhaps I wouldn't have the juice largely because I wouldn't care to pay back if the return is not enough, just like any investment. That being said, I wouldn't hesitate to hurt or even kill someone who threatens my body, possessions or loved ones. That's self-defense, though, very different in nature and action to vengeance. I don't believe in turning the other cheek. But I don't believe in being the aggressor either.
For the record I've never burned anyone's crops or smote someone's first born heir. I'm not here trying to play an internet tough guy, just discussing, philosophically.I think you're wrong.
The definition of vengeance makes no mention of satisfaction, though in ages past, people used the word in context of declaring their intention to obtain their due.
I believe in most cases, people who have achieved vengeance, typically describe their feelings afterward as being dissappointed, that they expected to feel more. They did not achieve the closure they were looking for.
I believe you if you say you are the type of person who makes good on their threats, rattlesnake and all, but I don't believe you when you say proper vengeance achieves satisfaction. Vengeance by definition does not require it.
The definition of satisfaction being a testimony of achievement of vengeance is mine. It's a compulsion, and ignoring it will not satisfy either. Regrets from vengeance are a side effect from the empathetic parts of the human mind. They're an asset to social harmony, but can be counterproductive to individual achievement, two frequently opposed objectives. Vengeance should be very satisfying to individual goals, assuming it was justified by social rank (i.e. you're not barking up the food chain) even if there are pangs of sympathy for the comeuppance you've delivered.