I might be dreaming of an LB-5. Or an SB-5. Or an LB-5Ton.
They teased a normal string spacing L5000 for a few years and never delivered. Love my L5000. Expect others would too if it had normal spacing.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I might be dreaming of an LB-5. Or an SB-5. Or an LB-5Ton.
Interesting I didnt know they teased a new L5000. I bet it would be popular. There would be complaints that an aftermarket pickup won't fit, but a refreshed L5000 would not be for those people.They teased a normal string spacing L5000 for a few years and never delivered. Love my L5000. Expect others would too if it had normal spacing.
Interesting I didnt know they teased a new L5000. I bet it would be popular. There would be complaints that an aftermarket pickup won't fit, but a refreshed L5000 would not be for those people.
I suppose I should say the teased a 5 string P bass (and most, including me, assumed it would be MFD equipped). Never happened. Closest we got was the 5 string Double P.
I have a hard time counting a custom shop only instrument as being what they were hinting at. They could have done a 5 string LB with a readily available pickup (instead of a 5 string MFD) and it would have been closer to what I expected than what we got.
Isn't that just a Matador? I do wish that was a regular production item.Had anyone, ever, daydreamt of an LB-200?
The 5-string double P with the L2500 750 chassis was interesting, but it makes a lot of sense as the starting point. Modifying an LB body to accommodate a 750 5-string neck takes a lot of tooling changes. Yes, CNC makes the actual fabrication easier, but it doesn't address the design time. While I'd love to see an MFD Split 5-string pickup, I'd probably be pretty happy with the 750 chassis in place of the more traditional LB chassis modified for 5 strings.
I was thinking merely of the humble, unglorified PJIsn't that just a Matador? I do wish that was a regular production item.
I prefer the slimmer body and standard G&L spacing. A P pickup in a 5 string Kilo would be more of what I want. Preferably an MFD P.
Oddly (or maybe not), I love the 17mm spacing on my fretless L2500. I have a Muckelroy 5 w/18mm that is also just about perfect. But when I play my son's fretted L2500, I'm reminded that I prefer wider spacing on my fretted 5s. However, I'm not at all bothered by 18mm on a fretted bass, so maybe that's a happy compromise. But if I was to get another G&L fretted 5, I'd mostly be looking at an L2500 750.
Then again, the M2500 does interest me a lot and I know I can play 17mm fretted basses just fine. The oddity to me is that I like the narrower spacing on fretless and wider on fretted.
I frequently have this thought with some of their custom shop stuff. Seems like there could be an opportunity for small batch special editions. Downside is that when they have done these so far, many have been expensive CS pieces. Something between CS and Fullerton pricing with new pickup/body combinations relative to the Fullerton line would be neat to see (though may or may not market well).
That'd be my question. I am not sure how many people would line up for a P/MFD bass.I frequently have this thought with some of their custom shop stuff. Seems like there could be an opportunity for small batch special editions. Downside is that when they have done these so far, many have been expensive CS pieces. Something between CS and Fullerton pricing with new pickup/body combinations relative to the Fullerton line would be neat to see (though may or may not market well).
That would be cool. For example, one could envision a Kiloton with an MFD J pickup toward the neck.
Maybe a couple hunnert pounds of string tension?But wait… whats holding the bridge down?
That plus the channel in the body that the bridge goes into (so it is not able to slide around between the tension and the chunk of metal going into the body).Maybe a couple hunnert pounds of string tension?
Sure. Just pointing out that the bridge comes with two screws and they ain't there. Probably because someone top loaded, the bridge ripped clean off the body, and now the screws won't stay.Maybe a couple hunnert pounds of string tension?
I wouldn't be put off by that if it was priced accordingly. A couple strings through the body provides plenty of down-force and the block under the bridge provides all the positional stability you could want. It would also be easy enough to remedy with machine screws through the string ferules.Sure. Just pointing out that the bridge comes with two screws and they ain't there. Probably because someone top loaded, the bridge ripped clean off the body, and now the screws won't stay.![]()
Yup and some have learned that lesson the hard way.Sure. Just pointing out that the bridge comes with two screws and they ain't there. Probably because someone top loaded, the bridge ripped clean off the body, and now the screws won't stay.![]()
