• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L Club Part 7

You'll get few opinions on this here. I was in your exact shoes... possibly along with @jmlee ? I couldn't get my exact tone out of the SB2 unless the planets were aligned, so I tried the LB100 and it's just perfect for me.

I've now been using LB100's for the last 3 years and I play punk/ metal/ alt/ rock. I like a very bright punchy "pick sound" although I play finger style.

Obviously, I'd say do it! But... the SB2 has been getting a lot of love "hear" lately, so you'll get a few giving you some suggestions about how to zero it in maybe? Either way, an SB2T might go quick here in the classy's.

the sb-2 is a weird one, it always brought the goods in the studio, live indoors, and live outdoors, but just playing in my house it always sounded not quite right unless it had long in the tooth hi beams(i really wanted to sound like a piano at the time), for me it was definitely a great band mix bass, i just was too fussy with it around the house for some reason

eventually i had to get rid of it, because when i turned 43 jazz width necks suddenly became kind of uncomfortable and more difficult for me to play

therefore i'm rocking the 84 L2000 and 94 LB100, because of their chunkier necks and pleasing house and live tones
 
Last edited:
Here's something, though. I put a G&L SB-1 pickup into an old Yamaha B-300 I had here at the house and, you know what, it sounds much better—but not like an SB.

Funny, I did this as well. I put the split MFD in a Squier precision special. Realized I had to have an SB of some kind. Got the SB-1 and loved it. But then I borrowed an SB-2 for a while, and decided I had to have one of those, too.
 
the sb-2 is a weird one, it always brought the goods in the studio, live indoors, and live outdoors, but just playing in my house it always sounded not quite right unless it had long in the tooth hi beams(i really wanted to sound like a piano at the time), for me it was definitely a great band mix bass, i just was too fussy with it around the house for some reason

eventually i had to get rid of it, because when i turned 43 jazz width necks suddenly became kind of uncomfortable and more difficult for me to play

therefore i'm rocking the 84 L2000 and 84 LB1000, because of their chunkier necks and pleasing house and live tones
Lol... I doubt that I've ever heard anyone on TB so close to my own tone requirements. I don't recall us ever discussing it, but piano tone is always what I shoot/ shot for, and primarily why the SB didn't work for me.

As for necks, that's what sent me to G&L in the first place. They were the only ones willing to give me 57 P profile, and that's what all of my basses have now. So... Even my Fender P's feel like an Ibanez compared to my G&L's
 
  • Like
Reactions: mpdd
Where the bleep are all you guys coming up with split MFD's? Lol.
4473057.jpg
 
In my case, I love my Tribute SB-2 with a tone mod—but really only after I put some Chromes on it and had a chance to play it out with other humans making noise. I've not done a show with it yet, but it speaks very, very well in rehearsal with a firmness and a sort of bite that I enjoy. I'm still waiting for my La Bella Deep Talkin' flats to arrive for the new LB100, but as an experiment I'm going to put one of my leftover sets of Chromes on it (instead of the stock D-Addario XLs) to do a bit of an A/B at least here at home to see if there's any sort of chalk and cheese distinction with same strings on both. I'll report back on my experience.

OK, so just put the Chromes on the LB-100 and spent 15 minutes A/Bing it and my SB-2 with the same strings on. Here's the observations:

(i) The SB has *way* more output, even with pickup heights up and optimized on the LB-100. It's kind of shocking comparing the two basses. The SB kicks output butt.
(ii) The tone of the LB-100 is, in two words, simple and straightforward. At least with these strings, the sound isn't particularly harmonically rich. It's mid-forward and uncomplicated, maybe even a little bland.
(iii) The tone of the SB-2 using the neck pickup only is much richer and more complex. There's a toothiness to it that is very satisfying. Cranking the volume back to match the LB-100 dimed, it's still richer sounding: more P-ish but decidedly not like the LB.
(iv) Adding the SB's bridge pickup makes for a very warm, rich sound that is a world away from the LB.

My first impression (and I know some of you won't agree with this) is that the Chromes are not a great match for my LB at least. The somewhat bright, uncomplicated sound is not what I want in this bass. So tonight I'll put on the La Bellas which were conveniently (if you call a 2 week wait convenient) in the mail today. We'll see. I paid a lot of money for the new LB and it's pretty as all get out but, with Chromes on at least, the Tribute SB is way more interesting.
 
I'm arguing with a guy on CL right now because he insists that it should have black cloth on it... So, stay tuned. I'd rather give it to you then to sell it to a turd handler like this tool.
Tell him that it's a super rare special edition that was commissioned by Gene Simmons himself and that it's worth at least 10 grand but since he's a local Jersey boy, you'll do him a solid and sell it to him for $900, no questions asked.