Where on the website? I couldn't find that.They only do the L-2000 Rustic now, according to their website. I have not asked though.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Where on the website? I couldn't find that.They only do the L-2000 Rustic now, according to their website. I have not asked though.
Same with me. My USA M-2500's neck is quartersawn. All wood lines along the neck (hardrock maple with RW FB) and headstock are at a right angle to the body. Bought brand new from a store and no mention of it in the production sheet nor in the ad. Another goodie from G&L![]()
So I wonder why some of us wound up getting quartersawn pieces. Do they have necks already partially made sans fretboards and it was quicker to use those? Either way, it saved us all $75 or so, so I'm not complaining![]()
Evidently, you can request 1/4 sawn and pay an upcharge, or take your chances and get lucky. A few years back, before it was an upgrade, it seemed like most of the new G&L basses I saw had it.
Quartersawn is nice, but I think G&L would do better with graphite supports as standard equipment. Like Carvin is doing.
Not speaking of necks though, but I have the same issue with this bass that I had with the LB-100 in that I have to get it shielded. It's not as bad as the LB-100 since I turn this bass up a lot less to achieve the same tone and volume, but the minimal shielding they use doesn't cut it here. We have a few outlets that aren't grounded 3 prong, so it's pretty noisy here. I even have problems with a battery powered amp. I think one of those outlets in the room just causes enough interference to be noisy. I'll drop it off to my tech this week most likely.
I gotta test mine! Keep reminding me!
Would the Quartersawn neck and graphite supports be overkill? Do think just having a stable quartersawn neck would trump graphite supports? At the cabinet shop I work at, forcing an unstable piece of wood into a straight line with screws, glue, biscuits, finish nails, etc...always causes mayhem down the road.
Dunno, I'm not a luthier or an engineer. I'd just rather not have to pay an upcharge for a quartersawn neck for perceived stability, when Carvin uses graphite on ALL their bass necks, for no charge.
The Carvin PB4 that I had for about 15 minutes had the typical dead spot on the 7th fret G. My Mike Lull P4 had graphite rods and had the same dead spot. My SB-2 has a slight one on the 6th fret. I contend that all basses have them, it's just to what degree the user can hear them. On all the basses I've had with perceived dead spots for example, if I play by the end of the fretboard it's more obvious. If I play over the pickup or closer to the bridge, I can't tell. I bet yours is there, but your EQ or playing style makes it less obvious. My test for them is to put some foam under the strings. The dead note will be a "plunk" compared to the others.
I've made peace with it since I've never had one that was OBVIOUS. A slight reduction in sustain or a slight change to the tone of the note compared to the others is minimal to me.

I was under the impression that only bolt-on necks had dead spots on the fret board, and that graphite and neck-through basses don't have problems. Enlighten me!![]()
I was under the impression that only bolt-on necks had dead spots on the fret board, and that graphite and neck-through basses don't have problems. Enlighten me!![]()
Not graphite, I meant carbon fiber necks!