• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L Club Part 7

It went back and I ordered something else.
@Scott Loveless After some ordering snafu's of a few different brand basses, finally settled on a lake placid blue G&L Tribute JB. I prefer to have the gloss neck and the vintage tint. I've always wanted a blocked and bound neck like that. I can't wait to get it.
 
I had never thought of the L2x00 curcuit this way - so technically (as a Fender Tone Stack behaves) it could be legit to run the bass and treble completely off and still produce a useable tone? I need to go home tonight and experiment a little!!!

I knew the bass and treble are passive - I run mine usually passive at about 75% bass, 50% treble, parallel, both pickups, volume 100% - and the tone is perfect - but I like getting new tones when I can. It never occurred to me to try lower options!
I did work there in the 80s and had several protracted conversation with Leo, George, and Dale. Worked and helped at NAMM for a couple years.
A former bandmate is a current master builder at Fender.
I have a bit of legitimate first hand experience ;) going back a bit.
 
So I really like the larger control knobs on the CLF research L2x00 basses. So I bought some 25mm knobs off Amazon.

What do you think? Too much?

IMG_20191126_215931.jpg
 
I Prefer the 3x2 config.

Me too. Quite apart from the sense it makes re: neck dive, on my 4+1 JB5, I find myself constantly tuning the D string when I mean to tune the G string—it just looks so much like a 4-string with that 5th tuner hiding on the other side of the headstock. With the 3+2 of my L2500 and M2500 I don't do that at all. Probably some perceptual miswiring in my brain.:meh: