• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L LB-100 vs. SB-1

I think the bridge pickup adds a lot to the range of sounds you can get out of it, so I definitely would prefer an SB-2 to an SB-1.

I've had an SB-2 for five years, and have come around to this view. I did add a tone control to mine, and it's worthwhile, but I think the bridge pickup is more useful on these. It's cool to add that growly edge to the monstrous MFD split-coil tone; it just kills in a band mix. Some P/J's don't work all that well IMO, but these pickups were designed to work together, and they do. The single coil hum usually isn't too bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawleeP
Hi I see you are in NOVA, which means to me Northern Virginia. If that is the case, go to Jive Sound in Alexandria. He has an SB-2 Tribute in stock and that will let you get a sense of what it sounds like and what it feels like.

If I were not hung up on getting a 5 string, I would get it in a heartbeat
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawleeP
Unfortunately my plans for a new SB-2 or LB-100 got sidelined due to some much needed home renovations, but I am still looking. Right now I'm leaning towards the SB-2. I have also been impressed with the demo Ed Friedland did on the MJ-4. Apparently he states that he is going to review the entire roster of G&L basses.
 
Bought an SB-1 and flipped it. Tried an SB-2 and thought that it was much more versatile than the beastly SB-1 but still didn't care for the fundamental characteristics inherent in the MFD.
It's no coincidence that lots of people love the traditional Precision design and G&L decided to start making the LB-100 again.
 
Bought an SB-1 and flipped it. Tried an SB-2 and thought that it was much more versatile than the beastly SB-1 but still didn't care for the fundamental characteristics inherent in the MFD.
It's no coincidence that lots of people love the traditional Precision design and G&L decided to start making the LB-100 again.

The SB series pickup is also closer to the bridge than a trad P, makes it a bit zingier.

And you'll pry my SB2 from my cold dead hands :)

I'm also in NOVA, (Fairfax) would be happy to let you try mine out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawleeP
I played a 1989 SB-1 for nine years. Maple body, Bahama Blue finish, crinkle black pickguard and bridge, curved-under rosewood fingerboard. That MFD split-coil pickup is so alive (hot) that it makes an LB-100 seem anemic.

Sample both models. You'll be able to tell the difference easily.

G&L needs to satisfy the market that believes that the Precision bass was George & Leo's greatest achievement in bass, and who dig the one-up authenticity of the G&L brand. That is primarily why the LB-100 model has ever been in the catalog.
 
Just checking in here... gL JB player. FWIW, custom made with Empress body. It took 6 months on back order but it was totally worth the weight... my JB weighs in at 8.4! I use it for my cover band gigs where I'm on stage 4 hours a night. One thing to consider with the empress, it makes the balance of the instrument very close to nose dive territory. On the JB with the narrow #8 neck, the balance is just right. However, I've played an LB100 with empress body and the neck felt a good pound heavier! It was nose dive constantly and a very poor playing experience (I can't stand nose dive). With the SB, I'd imagine the same thing because it uses the same neck as the LB100. If I had $1500 to drop right now, I'd buy an SB2 w/ standard woods w/ #8 neck.

Does any body know of some recordings with the bassist using an SB2?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PawleeP
Just checking in here... gL JB player. FWIW, custom made with Empress body. It took 6 months on back order but it was totally worth the weight... my JB weighs in at 8.4! I use it for my cover band gigs where I'm on stage 4 hours a night. One thing to consider with the empress, it makes the balance of the instrument very close to nose dive territory. On the JB with the narrow #8 neck, the balance is just right. However, I've played an LB100 with empress body and the neck felt a good pound heavier! It was nose dive constantly and a very poor playing experience (I can't stand nose dive). With the SB, I'd imagine the same thing because it uses the same neck as the LB100. If I had $1500 to drop right now, I'd buy an SB2 w/ standard woods w/ #8 neck.

Does any body know of some recordings with the bassist using an SB2?

Here's a recording of me on my SB-2 from 2008. The bass is a 96, if I recall correctly. Still have it! :D

Get Up

Here's that same bass from last year:



And then that bass live:

 
Here's a recording of me on my SB-2 from 2008. The bass is a 96, if I recall correctly. Still have it! :D

Get Up

Here's that same bass from last year:



And then that bass live:



Sounds great in all 3 scenarios! Such a unique tone, to my ears, it's somewhere between a LB100 and a Ray. These are actually the first recordings I've heard where I know it's an SB2 and now I want one even more. What rigs were you using in these 3 scenarios? Strings/pedals etc? Just looking for the whole picture...
 
  • Like
Reactions: lildrgn