I love 1st world problems. Having to be bothered to move my hand an extra 3inches to unplug the cab when I plug in my phones.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Quick question that I haven't been able to find an easy answer to - when headphones are plugged into the rear of an MG350 head, does it automatically disable the the output to the speaker or does the speaker need to be manually unplugged?
Asking for a 'friend' who assumed the former when purchasing and is experiencing the latter and finding it a real pain.
Thx
OK, so I have a question for the group, I'm really interested in 2 cabs in particular (hoping I'll be in a buying position this summer) I'll be using a Magellan 800, with more than a few effects, mostly various drives/fuzzes. I'm mostly playing rock, but I'd like something that can cover more bases if needed.
I'm currently running the Magellan on top of my GK Neo412, and I'm keeping this cab for the very rare occurrence that I land on a huge stage, this combo is SILLY loud and sounds fantastic, but....It's a LOT of rig for most of my gigs.
The Cabs I'm looking at:
Nu Classic 212T
Magellan 212T
I know some of the differences:
Neo drivers in the Magellan vs Ferrite/Ceramic drivers in the Nu Classic.
Baltic Birch in the Magellan vs Poplar in the Nu Classic
Triangular Ports in the Magellan vs more traditional? ports in the Nu Classic
33-14KHz Freq. response in the Magellan vs 45-14KHz in the Nu Classic
There are obviously many more differences, but these 4 in particular seemed like they could make the different "personalities" between these two cabs more obvious.
Thoughts on which is better suited to my particular needs?
Yes, this exactly. I should have been more concise in my post. In an ideal world, I'd just plug in headphones and cabs would go silent automatically and I wouldn't have to remove both cab speakON connectors. My MG350 doesn't do this, trying to find out if it's supposed to or not.
Thanks for the tip, guess I'll be doing the same with the daisy chaining. Unlike some wise-a$$ above, my head isn't situated with the easiest of access to the rear - will have to change that.What I do is daisy chain my cabs so there is only one cable at the head. When I use my headphones I just unlock the speakon and twist - no need to fully unplug (thanks @Jeff Genzler for that tip). I leave my phones plugged in at home so all I'm doing is twisting one way or the other depending on the time of day or if someone is on a zoom call...
As @Holdsg mentioned, I too remember Jeff having addressed this earlier.25220768[/URL], member: 103810"]I can see the logic in this design. If the speakers are not disconnected when you plug in the headphones, you have the option of using both simultaneously. If the speakers are disconnected when headphones are used that option is removed. I don't know how useful this is to players but there it is...
Bob
As @Holdsg mentioned, I too remember Jeff having addressed this earlier.
I *think* that it had something to do with the amount signal involved and that putting a disconnect on the headphone jack with the amount of signal going to the speaker jacks is very difficult/expensive/impossible. It wasn’t a simple “let’s do it this way” decision.
I also remember that he observed that it is only only the smallest, lowest quality amps that plugging in a pair of headphones disconnects the speakers.
I debated getting another 10 for my combo. I instead went with the 12T-V and couldn’t be happier. I think it’s actually easier to move the “larger” rig around. It sounds amazing and is still a one hand/trip carry.I recently got the Magellan 350 10 combo and had a lot of time to play today and get intimate with the controls. My wife, still befuddled by the sound coming out of what her eyes say is a 'small' amp, comes in at one point and sees me sitting way forward and down in my chair so I could be low enough to see the controls. She said 'Hey, do they make some kind of riser for your amp so you could see it easier?'
I told her, 'Yes. Yes, as a matter of fact they do. Do you think it would be better 10 inches higher or 12?'
(Didn't work.....)
I debated getting another 10 for my combo. I instead went with the 12T-V and couldn’t be happier. I think it’s actually easier to move the “larger” rig around. It sounds amazing and is still a one hand/trip carry.
I wish I used my amp more and needed more sound than the single cab as they look so cool stacked.And there are those of us who think a 350 w two of the 12T-Vs, would be “oh, so sneaky!” And awesome!
I recently got the Magellan 350 10 combo and had a lot of time to play today and get intimate with the controls. My wife, still befuddled by the sound coming out of what her eyes say is a 'small' amp, comes in at one point and sees me sitting way forward and down in my chair so I could be low enough to see the controls. She said 'Hey, do they make some kind of riser for your amp so you could see it easier?'
I told her, 'Yes. Yes, as a matter of fact they do. Do you think it would be better 10 inches higher or 12?'
(Didn't work.....)
OK, so I have a question for the group, I'm really interested in 2 cabs in particular (hoping I'll be in a buying position this summer) I'll be using a Magellan 800, with more than a few effects, mostly various drives/fuzzes. I'm mostly playing rock, but I'd like something that can cover more bases if needed.
I'm currently running the Magellan on top of my GK Neo412, and I'm keeping this cab for the very rare occurrence that I land on a huge stage, this combo is SILLY loud and sounds fantastic, but....It's a LOT of rig for most of my gigs.
The Cabs I'm looking at:
Nu Classic 212T
Magellan 212T
I know some of the differences:
Neo drivers in the Magellan vs Ferrite/Ceramic drivers in the Nu Classic.
Baltic Birch in the Magellan vs Poplar in the Nu Classic
Triangular Ports in the Magellan vs more traditional? ports in the Nu Classic
33-14KHz Freq. response in the Magellan vs 45-14KHz in the Nu Classic
There are obviously many more differences, but these 4 in particular seemed like they could make the different "personalities" between these two cabs more obvious.
Thoughts on which is better suited to my particular needs?
We're about 2 weeks out from shipping initial cabs on order.Does anyone who ordered one or more of the NCs have a delivery date yet? I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts on them.
Sorry I missed this. Between these 2 cabs listed the MG-212T is doing to be the more aggressive cab with the Neo drivers, especially on the mids. You may like that. The NC cabs will be smoother in the mids, with very deep, tight LF. They both use the same tweeter. MG cabs are more efficient, but the NC have a more organic, earthy tone.OK, so I have a question for the group, I'm really interested in 2 cabs in particular (hoping I'll be in a buying position this summer) I'll be using a Magellan 800, with more than a few effects, mostly various drives/fuzzes. I'm mostly playing rock, but I'd like something that can cover more bases if needed.
I'm currently running the Magellan on top of my GK Neo412, and I'm keeping this cab for the very rare occurrence that I land on a huge stage, this combo is SILLY loud and sounds fantastic, but....It's a LOT of rig for most of my gigs.
The Cabs I'm looking at:
Nu Classic 212T
Magellan 212T
I know some of the differences:
Neo drivers in the Magellan vs Ferrite/Ceramic drivers in the Nu Classic.
Baltic Birch in the Magellan vs Poplar in the Nu Classic
Triangular Ports in the Magellan vs more traditional? ports in the Nu Classic
33-14KHz Freq. response in the Magellan vs 45-14KHz in the Nu Classic
There are obviously many more differences, but these 4 in particular seemed like they could make the different "personalities" between these two cabs more obvious.
Thoughts on which is better suited to my particular needs?