• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Get off my LAWN! "Grumpy Old Farts"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like distortion, but look at the age of this thing:

I didn't go in with any expectations as to how it would sound cranked up this way. Breakup was very soft and it took hitting the strings really hard to get there. BTW: I think Andy for the HPF on that one. I think I could have gotten into trouble without it :D

There are earlier versions of tube overdrive algorithms in the ML-200, the ML-135 isn't as sophisticated but still way better than what anybody else was doing WAY back then... that was 20 years ago!

Did anyone suggest that the caps need changing? :laugh:

I have an ML-200 running my shop system and it has over 26,000 hours on those poor, often disrespected filter caps ;)

(Actually, it probably has over 30,000 hours on it)
 
There are earlier versions of tube overdrive algorithms in the ML-200, the ML-135 isn't as sophisticated but still way better than what anybody else was doing WAY back then... that was 20 years ago!



I have an ML-200 running my shop system and it has over 26,000 hours on those poor, often disrespected filter caps ;)

(Actually, it probably has over 30,000 hours on it)
Really amazing. I expected some sort of limits to cranking it up.

I crack up so often reading about this amp or cab is now (maybe) able to do what GB did long ago.
 
Nice amps. Real band. Good sound.

It’s after 4PM on the east coast. Most oldies have already had the earlybird special.

Waiting For The Wind

Been eatin' all day at WDW Food & Wine Festival. Barely able to move. Gig tomorrow night at American Legion in Port St. Lucie, FL. Always a fun crowd.:bassist:
 
That’s how design is, a moment in time, built on the past. It progresses in increments. Future designs are built on what came before them.

Some designs stand the test of time, others become dated for different reasons. Sometimes they are limited by the technology of the day. Circuit boards are one example.

Back in the early 70’s, good quality PCB manufacturing was available. But despite that, many amp companies stayed with inexpensive eyelet boards or cheesy single sided circuit boards that were produced in-house. Cost saving measures were always in place. They also didn’t want to invest in updating their equipment. This wasn’t just the musical instrument industry, it applied to TV’s, radios, hi-fi, and other consummer goods.

It took some companies time to catch up. In some cases, engineers were brought in that had experience in other fields and they changed how design and manufacturing was approached. Computers revolutionized design and manufacturing. Technology moved the industry forward.

The introduction of digital equipment made a difference across the industry. I marvel at what Yamaha did in the 80’s with their pianos, synths, and drum machines. Their digital mixers were way ahead of everyone else. MIDI conflicts still manages to drive me nuts. :laugh:

Component performance specs and quality improvments have taken a big leap forward. They make things possible that couldn’t have been in the past.
 
Last edited:
The introduction of digital equipment made a difference across the industry. I marvel at what Yamaha did in the 80’s with their pianos, synths, and drum machines. Their digital mixers were way ahead of everyone else. MIDI conflicts still manages to drive me nuts. :laugh:
Yamaha has always had an excellent rep in my eyes. I remember friends owning Yamaha PA systems and they were quite (rightfully) proud of them. Excellent quality. Even in the 70's Yamaha bass and guitar amps were pretty good for their time.
 
There are earlier versions of tube overdrive algorithms in the ML-200, the ML-135 isn't as sophisticated but still way better than what anybody else was doing WAY back then... that was 20 years ago!



I have an ML-200 running my shop system and it has over 26,000 hours on those poor, often disrespected filter caps ;)

(Actually, it probably has over 30,000 hours on it)
Hey, @agedhorse how's it going? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: GonePlaid
...I marvel at what Yamaha did in the 80’s with their pianos, synths, and drum machines. Their digital mixers were way ahead of everyone else....
This is why I have such high hopes for Ampeg's future. IMO Yamaha has always been a thought leader in any area where they decided to engage and very solid in R&D/innovation. They have also consistently placed a high value on their reputation in the eyes of their competitors as well as their customers.
 
Last edited:
This is why I have such high hopes for Ampeg's future. IMO Yamaha has always been a thought leader in any area were they decided to engage and very solid in R&D/innovation. They have also consistently placed a high value on their reputation in the eyes of their competitors as well as their customers.
I'm betting they'll come out with an Ampeg class D the size of a GK or TC Electronics. I think that would be cool. :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: GonePlaid
I recently bought and sold an Ampeg PF-350. It was nice and had great tone but it was twice as big as my GK MB500. Something between the MB200 and MB500....
Wow, that surprises me as I figured those heads (which I've never seen in person) would be of similar size and weight with their competition. I mean that size and weight convenience factor on the competitor heads isn't the only selling point, but it is really nice!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GonePlaid
Wow, that surprises me as I figured those heads (which I've never seen in person) would be of similar size and weight with their competition. I mean that size and weight convenience factor on the competitor heads isn't the only selling point, but it is really nice!!
Well, Al, the amp was very nice. The PF-350 was the smallest of the lot, but it was honestly significantly larger than the GK's. Here's the specs from the Ampeg site:

  • RMS power output: 350W @ 4 ohms
  • Preamp: Solid-state
  • Power amp: Class D
  • Tone controls: bass, mid, treble
  • Onboard limiter
  • Balanced direct out
  • FX loop
  • 1/8” headphone out / line in
  • -15db input pad
  • Power supply: switching
  • Dimensions (H x W x D inches) :
    • 2 x 11 x 11 in
    • 69 x 275 x 272 mm
  • Handling weight: 8 lbs / 3.6 kg
Gallien Krueger MB500:
Power
@4Ω
500 WATTS
Dimensions
10.75 x 9 x 1.75"
3.75 LBS
Preamp
SOLID STATE
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
 
  • Like
Reactions: GonePlaid
Well, Al, the amp was very nice. The PF-350 was the smallest of the lot, but it was honestly significantly larger than the GK's. Here's the specs from the Ampeg site:

  • RMS power output: 350W @ 4 ohms
  • Preamp: Solid-state
  • Power amp: Class D
  • Tone controls: bass, mid, treble
  • Onboard limiter
  • Balanced direct out
  • FX loop
  • 1/8” headphone out / line in
  • -15db input pad
  • Power supply: switching
  • Dimensions (H x W x D inches) :
    • 2 x 11 x 11 in
    • 69 x 275 x 272 mm
  • Handling weight: 8 lbs / 3.6 kg
Gallien Krueger MB500:
Power
@4Ω
500 WATTS
Dimensions
10.75 x 9 x 1.75"
3.75 LBS
Preamp
SOLID STATE
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
I know this sounds ridiculous coming from a bass player who grew up with the gear we did Will, but these days I expect GK MB or Mesa D-800 size, weight and performance from a well-engineered bass amp. I know that's not necessarily fair, and in some cases wouldn't be a deal breaker, but my Mesa and GK class D heads readily check all the boxes and are my benchmark.

My guess is that the Yamaha/Ampeg folks are already talking about where the bar has been set by their competition and discussing what they need to do move up-market from there.
 
Bass has always been the enigma...anyone can (seemingly has) build an amp for bass, but very few seem to get it right - yet when they do, the marketplace changes...

Which frankly is idiocy. Who is driving this - customers demanding smaller/less expensive/totally different, or manufacturers essentially telling customers what they will like?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts