• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Gibson making basses again

I'd rock it...
Has all the ingredients I prefer...Dual humbuckers, ash body, massive bridge, 4+1 headstock... And ~$1000 for a USA bass...plenty of room to add coil-tap switches and preamp...
What's not to like?
Looks can be said that they seem borrowed from the Tobias line...but they own that anyway...

looks like neck through. That is a positive over Fender who refuses to do anything but bolt on.
 
One thing I want to say is; just because the majority doesn't like something doesn't mean that they're "sheep". I personally can't stand when people use that excuse when people express dislike or are hating on something they like (or think is cool, a good idea etc.). Not everyone are sheep (of course, some are), maybe the majority just happened to agree on disliking something. We never agree on anything here :roflmao:

Now, about the bass... I don't hate it, it's REALLY cheap for a USA Gibson so I would love to hear it! I don't think if purchase it just because that's not my style of bass. But it doesn't look horrible :)
 
I'd be happy if they brought back this.
fmnpf.jpg
 
getting a new bridge design, or 2nd party design, is a good idea, because their old bass bridges are a hard turn-off for me

I don't know why they didn't use the bridges on the Money Basses (like in my avatar), Thunderbird Studios, and Gibson Tobias basses more often. They are a great bridge! They just got super stuck on that 3 point for some reason.
 
I think Gibson could learn a thing or two from Fender... I'm sure many people would be interested in vintage-correct T-Bird II and IV reissues, and EB0, 2 and 3 reissues as well. And maybe even Custom Shop relic'ed basses. Don't they already do it with their guitars anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: D.M.N.
There seems to be a paradox around Gibson. If they make a bass design that doesn't incorporate traditional Gibson appointments then they are simply ripping off Carvin, G&L et al. If they incorporate traditional Gibson appointments then people pour scorn on those. Now people are wistfully reminiscing about the 2012 Gibson EB bass?!?! At the time I saw people calling it un-Gibson, and a Mosrite copy... People are also bagging on the new bass because it has a Thunderbird headstock?!?!?!?!!?

Gibson cannot win!
 
There seems to be a paradox around Gibson. If they make a bass design that doesn't incorporate traditional Gibson appointments then they are simply ripping off Carvin, G&L et al. If they incorporate traditional Gibson appointments then people pour scorn on those. Now people are wistfully reminiscing about the 2012 Gibson EB bass?!?! At the time I saw people calling it un-Gibson, and a Mosrite copy... People are also bagging on the new bass because it has a Thunderbird headstock?!?!?!?!!?

Gibson cannot win!

You hit the nail right on the head here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Axstar